Re: Drop ?g-boxes?, talk about ?stateful resources?

On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:08:41AM +0100, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> >> This is a proposal to drop the term ?g-box? from our graph
> >> vocabulary, along with all the other terms it has inspired such as
> >> ?layer? or ?space?, and use the term ?stateful resource? instead.
> > 
> > I like the idea behind this and the reasoning in support of it, but
> > I find this actual term ugly, just on literary criteria. (It sounds
> > like the resource if full of state, like "boastful resource".)  
> 
> It sounds lovely to me.

"Stateful", and "full of statements".  Not that I'd argue against it...

Tom

-- 
Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>