W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: Drop ?g-boxes?, talk about ?stateful resources?

From: Thomas Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 21:30:07 -0400
To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20120523013007.GA8646@alpha.dublincore.org>
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:08:41AM +0100, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> >> This is a proposal to drop the term ?g-box? from our graph
> >> vocabulary, along with all the other terms it has inspired such as
> >> ?layer? or ?space?, and use the term ?stateful resource? instead.
> > 
> > I like the idea behind this and the reasoning in support of it, but
> > I find this actual term ugly, just on literary criteria. (It sounds
> > like the resource if full of state, like "boastful resource".)  
> It sounds lovely to me.

"Stateful", and "full of statements".  Not that I'd argue against it...


Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2012 01:31:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:05 UTC