W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG

From: Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 16:45:20 +0200
Message-ID: <-5512442485475734306@unknownmsgid>
To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>

> […] as it apparently tries hard to avoid any association with RDF.
…and I doubt that an RDF reference is necessarily the most desired
thing the editors want to add to the spec. It's per design as far as I
can tell (I only loosely followed the spec building process, though) .

Cheers,
Tom

Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2012 14:46:29 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Pat Hayes: "Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources”"
Previous message: Richard Cyganiak: "Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG"
In reply to: Richard Cyganiak: "Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG"
Next in thread: David Wood: "Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:49 GMT