W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: Definitions of namespace IRI/prefix added to RDF Concepts (was: Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace")

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 14:12:32 +0100
Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <0AC72B8A-DF0C-4CAC-8D4A-92107486279A@cyganiak.de>
To: Thomas Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
On 12 May 2012, at 21:46, Thomas Baker wrote:
> One small point: instead of 
> 
>    but is sometimes incorrectly used to mean “namespace IRI” or “RDF vocabulary”
> 
> perhaps:
> 
>    but is sometimes informally (and ambiguously) used to mean “namespace IRI”
>    or “RDF vocabulary”
> 
> ...the point being that if something does not have a well-defined meaning,
> who's to say it is being used "incorrectly"? ;-)

Concurred. I changed “incorrectly” to “informally”.

Richard
Received on Sunday, 13 May 2012 13:13:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:48 GMT