public-html@w3.org from February 2012 by author

'Janina Sajka'

• Re: Change Proposal for Issue 194 (Wednesday, 15 February)

Adam Sobieski

• RE: MathML and Digital Textbooks (Wednesday, 22 February)
• RE: Hyperlink and Metadata (Thursday, 9 February)
• RE: HTML5 and Speech Input (Friday, 3 February)

Adrian Bateman

• RE: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 21 February)
• RE: {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2012-02-09: issue progress, task force reports, revert request, new information deadline, F2F (Thursday, 9 February)

Andreas Kuckartz

• Media Stack: closed source only Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Adversaries Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 27 February)
• Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Saturday, 25 February)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings (Wednesday, 15 February)

Arthur Barstow

• DOM Parsing and Serialization: which W3C WG? [Was: Re: ISSUE-198: innerHTML-patent-policy - Chairs Solicit Proposals] (Monday, 27 February)

Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis

• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Sunday, 26 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Sunday, 26 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Sunday, 26 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Sunday, 26 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Sunday, 26 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: ISSUE-200: legend-placement - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: ISSUE-30: Native HTML vs ARIA/XML (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Change Proposal for Issue 194 (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Issue 131 Change Proposal (Sunday, 12 February)
• Re: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request] (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request] (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: Request to re-open issue 131 -USE CASES, USE CASES, USE CASES (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: HTML5 and Speech Input (Friday, 3 February)
• Re: Request to re-open issue 131 -USE CASES, USE CASES, USE CASES (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]] (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request] (Thursday, 2 February)
• Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]] (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: Revert Request (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: Revert Request (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Hidden file inputs [Was: Revert Request] (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Hidden file inputs [Was: Revert Request] (Wednesday, 1 February)

Bob Lund

• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 24 February)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Saturday, 25 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Question about document.referrer (and document.URL, document.location.href) when IDN domains are in use (Saturday, 4 February)
• Question about document.referrer (and document.URL, document.location.href) when IDN domains are in use (Saturday, 4 February)
• Re: document.write() and .close() allowed on IFRAME though its document.domain was set (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: document.write() and .close() allowed on IFRAME though its document.domain was set (Thursday, 2 February)

bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

• [Bug 16142] New: Spec delivery semantics for MutationObservers (Monday, 27 February)
• [Bug 16106] New: Clarify paragraph about character references in tokenization.html (Friday, 24 February)
• [Bug 16065] New: Consistent attribute value quoting in examples. The examples throughout the HTML5 specification have an inconsistent use of attribute value quoting, this can be observed in particular in the Forms section (4.10). Where one attribute value is surrounded by (Tuesday, 21 February)
• [Bug 16066] New: Use of single solidus character on void elements. Almost all void elements used in the examples throughout the HTML5 specification have no closing single solidus character. In the Start tags section (8.1.2.1) it states that its use has no effect on void e (Tuesday, 21 February)
• [Bug 16067] New: Consistent use of 'no value' attributes. The 'no value' attributes like "selected", "checked" and "required" are being used inconsistently in the examples throughout the HTML5 specifications. Where "required" is always used with no value ('required' vs 'r (Tuesday, 21 February)
• [Bug 16061] New: Required edit should be applicable to fieldset (Tuesday, 21 February)
• [Bug 16051] New: Triggering contextual error message for inputs (Tuesday, 21 February)
• [Bug 16040] New: Use IDL union types where appropriate (Monday, 20 February)
• [Bug 16039] New: Stop using AllowAny (Monday, 20 February)
• [Bug 16026] New: This is general feedback on the overall standard, as far as I understand it. This is feedback from an average web user who knows a decent amount of fundamental HTML (primarily self-taught) who regularly uses it to varying degrees on various forums, blogs (Sunday, 19 February)
• [Bug 16022] New: Actually the required tag of controls are rendered as "required" attribute of html 5 elements. Then the validation will be controlled by your browser. Unfortunately "validation group" or something like that has not been introduced in html 5 (yet, and as f (Saturday, 18 February)
• [Bug 16027] New: [AAPI]: add id's to each details element (Sunday, 19 February)
• [Bug 16005] New: Media elements: I would suggest that Subtitle support be implemented for Audio Media elements for the hearing impaired users. It should also include an api that would allow custom presentation of the subtitles. (Thursday, 16 February)
• [Bug 16004] New: Headings and sections (example is incorrect?) (Thursday, 16 February)
• [Bug 16001] New: Clarify bidi aspects of <wbr> (Thursday, 16 February)
• [Bug 15996] New: How do I solve these errors? # Error Line 2, Column 219: Attribute xmlns:b not allowed here. …www.google.com/2005/gml/data' xmlns:expr='http://www.google.com/2005/gml/expr'> # Warning Line 2, Column 219: Attribute with the local name xmlns:b is not serial (Thursday, 16 February)
• [Bug 15994] New: origin attribute (Wednesday, 15 February)
• [Bug 15974] New: There are many users of HTML today who are not necessarily document authors. They are CMS users, forum posters, etc. I think it is odd that so many years later we are still using "a href" for links. "Anchor" and "hyper-reference" do not match the vocabula (Monday, 13 February)
• [Bug 15965] New: add onreadystatechange attribute to index (Monday, 13 February)
• [Bug 15953] New: Section title: "The placeholder attribute" "User agents should present this hint to the user, after having stripped line breaks from it, when the element's value is the empty string and the control is not focused (e.g. by displaying it inside a blank unfo (Friday, 10 February)
• [Bug 15948] New: <area> should be classified as "interactive content" (Friday, 10 February)
• [Bug 15940] New: W3C websites look dreadful on my android phone. This does not inspire confidence in the material the organisation has to offer. There are numerous typos and other mistakes so it is frankly rather depressing. Never the less I shall attempt to continue read (Thursday, 9 February)
• [Bug 15936] New: HTML+RDFa promotes DTD-based validation (Wednesday, 8 February)
• [Bug 15913] New: HTML+RDFa adds href, src, rev and rel attributes to all elements (Monday, 6 February)
• [Bug 15905] New: I wanted to be able to grab the information that Output is using, do some logic to it in my javascript, and send it back. However, apparently the element only returns an empty string when called, so I can't utilize it that way. (Sunday, 5 February)
• [Bug 15904] New: On: The pattern attribute (forms) The spec does not clarify what the reserved characters of the regular expressions are, and what the escape character is, nor whether there is any. The pattern attribute value example ("[0-9][A-Z]{3}") is a trivial one. Bu (Sunday, 5 February)
• [Bug 15876] New: HTML5 equivalent of scrollIntoView(); (Saturday, 4 February)
• [Bug 15874] New: The third paragraph under the canvas element write-up: -- When authors use the canvas element, they must also provide content that, when presented to the user, conveys essentially the same function or purpose as the bitmap canvas. This content may be plac (Friday, 3 February)
• [Bug 15855] New: After the example given for the h1,h2,h3 etc. elements is this non-sensical sentence. Authors might prefer the former style for its terseness, or the latter style for its convenience in the face of heavy editing; which is besty is purely an issue of prefe (Thursday, 2 February)

Cameron Heavon-Jones

• Re: ISSUE-196: ua-http-resp-handling - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: ISSUE-184: data-element - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: ISSUE-183: enhance-time - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 9 February)

Cameron Jones

• Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Thursday, 16 February)

Cameron McCormack

• Re: Split Issue 30? (Monday, 13 February)

Carr, Wayne

• RE: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 24 February)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: April face-to-face meetings for HTML and WebApps (Sunday, 12 February)
• Re: Request to re-open issue 131 -USE CASES, USE CASES, USE CASES (Monday, 6 February)

Charles Pritchard

• Re: Encrypting content stored on untrusted CDNs (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Encrypting content stored on untrusted CDNs (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Sunday, 26 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Sunday, 26 February)
• Re: Process question re. autofocus bug status [was Re: autofocus on links is missing?] (Friday, 24 February)
• Arbitrary codecs and encryption schemes, was: Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Change Proposal for Issue 194 (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: Change Proposal for Issue 194 (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: ISSUE-205 opened (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: ISSUE-205 opened (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: ISSUE-30: Native HTML vs ARIA/XML (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Sunday, 12 February)
• Re: Issue 131 Change Proposal (Sunday, 12 February)
• Re: Issue 131 Change Proposal (Sunday, 12 February)
• Re: Canvas as input vs. img (was Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]]) (Saturday, 11 February)
• Re: Issue 131 Change Proposal (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: ISSUE-201: Change proposal (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: Canvas as input vs. img (was Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]]) (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: Canvas as input vs. img (was Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]]) (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated" Change Proposal) (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: Canvas as input vs. img (was Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]]) (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: Canvas as input vs. img (was Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]]) (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: Canvas as input vs. img (was Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]]) (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]] (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: Request to re-open issue 131 -USE CASES, USE CASES, USE CASES (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: Request to re-open issue 131 -USE CASES, USE CASES, USE CASES (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: Request to re-open issue 131 -USE CASES, USE CASES, USE CASES (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: Revert Request (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Revert Request (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Revert Request (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Hidden file inputs [Was: Revert Request] (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Revert Request (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Hidden file inputs [Was: Revert Request] (Wednesday, 1 February)

Chris Pearce

• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 22 February)

Clarke Stevens

• Re: Encrypting content stored on untrusted CDNs (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Saturday, 25 February)

Danny Ayers

• Re: Process question re. autofocus bug status [was Re: autofocus on links is missing?] (Friday, 24 February)
• Process question re. autofocus bug status [was Re: autofocus on links is missing?] (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: autofocus on links is missing? (Tuesday, 21 February)
• autofocus on links is missing? (Sunday, 19 February)

David Dorwin

• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 28 February)

David MacDonald

• RE: Change Proposal for Issue 194 (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Monday, 13 February)

David Singer

• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: Change Proposal for Issue 194 (Wednesday, 15 February)

Dominique Hazael-Massieux

• Re: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings (Wednesday, 15 February)

Edward O'Connor

• Re: ISSUE-189: uri-web-prefix - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: CfC: Adopt time syntax changes from (Wednesday, 22 February)

Eric Carlson

• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Thursday, 23 February)

Frank Olivier

• RE: Issue 131 Change Proposal (Monday, 13 February)
• RE: Issue 131 Change Proposal (Monday, 13 February)
• RE: Issue 131 Change Proposal (Saturday, 11 February)
• RE: Issue 131 Change Proposal (Friday, 10 February)
• Issue 131 Change Proposal (Friday, 10 February)
• Issue 131 Change Proposal (Friday, 10 February)
• ISSUE-201: Change proposal (Friday, 10 February)
• RE: Canvas as input vs. img (was Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]]) (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: Request to re-open issue 131 -USE CASES, USE CASES, USE CASES (Thursday, 2 February)

Glenn Adams

• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish ten heartbeat drafts as WDs (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Sunday, 26 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Saturday, 25 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Saturday, 25 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Saturday, 25 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Saturday, 25 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Thursday, 23 February)
• [Minutes] (HTML WG telecon 2012-02-23: issue progress, heartbeat drafts, task force reports) (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: <param> (was Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 22 February)

Henri Sivonen

• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Change Proposal for ISSUE-170, was: ISSUE-170 rel-uri-valid: Chairs Solicit Proposals (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Saturday, 25 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Saturday, 25 February)
• Re: Arbitrary codecs and encryption schemes, was: Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 24 February)

Ian Devlin

• Re: ISSUE-185: drop-pubdate - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Monday, 6 February)

Ian Hickson

• Re: Encrypting content stored on untrusted CDNs (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Encrypting content stored on untrusted CDNs (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Encrypting content stored on untrusted CDNs (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Process question re. autofocus bug status [was Re: autofocus on links is missing?] (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Process question re. autofocus bug status [was Re: autofocus on links is missing?] (Friday, 24 February)
• RE: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Process question re. autofocus bug status [was Re: autofocus on links is missing?] (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: ISSUE-199: aria-processing - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: ISSUE-197: accept-file-ext - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: ISSUE-201: Change proposal (Friday, 10 February)

Janina Sajka

• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Thursday, 23 February)
• Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Change Proposal for Issue 194 (Monday, 13 February)
• Request to Reconsider Meta Generator Alt Exception (Friday, 10 February)

Jirka Kosek

• Re: ISSUE-187: validity-stability - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 29 February)

John C. Vernaleo

• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Saturday, 25 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Saturday, 25 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Saturday, 25 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 24 February)

John Foliot

• RE: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 24 February)
• RE: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Friday, 24 February)
• Change Proposal for Issue 194 (Monday, 13 February)
• RE: Split Issue 30? (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated" Change Proposal) (Thursday, 9 February)
• RE: Revert Request (Thursday, 2 February)
• RE: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request] (Thursday, 2 February)
• RE: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request] (Wednesday, 1 February)

Jonas Sicking

• Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated") (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Sunday, 12 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Sunday, 12 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Sunday, 12 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated" Change Proposal) (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]] (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated" Change Proposal) (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]] (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated" Change Proposal for ISSUE-30 (Saturday, 4 February)
• Re: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated" Change Proposal for ISSUE-30 (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: Revert Request (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: Revert Request (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Revert Request (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Revert Request (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Revert Request (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Revert Request (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Revert Request (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Revert Request (Wednesday, 1 February)

Julian Reschke

• Re: Change Proposal for ISSUE-189, was: ISSUE-189: uri-web-prefix - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Tuesday, 14 February)

Karl Dubost

• Re: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request] (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: Hyperlink and Metadata (Monday, 6 February)

Kornel Lesiński

• Re: Encrypting content stored on untrusted CDNs (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Missing hardest parts of actual content protection (was Re: Encrypted Media proposal) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Sunday, 26 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Sunday, 26 February)

L. David Baron

• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 24 February)

Laura Carlson

• Re: CfC: Publish ten heartbeat drafts as WDs (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish ten heartbeat drafts as WDs (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish ten heartbeat drafts as WDs (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: ISSUE-30: Chair review of Instate Longesc Change Propsoal (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: ISSUE-30: Chair review of Instate Longesc Change Propsoal (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: ISSUE-30: Chair review of Instate Longesc Change Propsoal (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: ISSUE-30: Chair review of Instate Longesc Change Propsoal (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: ISSUE-205 opened (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated" Change Proposal) (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated" Change Proposal) (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated" Change Proposal) (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated" Change Proposal) (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated" Change Proposal) (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: ISSUE-30: Chair review of Instate Longesc Change Propsoal (Tuesday, 7 February)

Leif Halvard Silli

• Re: Request to Reconsider Meta Generator Alt Exception [ISSUE-31] (Sunday, 26 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Sunday, 26 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Sunday, 26 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Sunday, 26 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Sunday, 26 February)
• Re: Process question re. autofocus bug status [was Re: autofocus on links is missing?] (Saturday, 25 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Saturday, 25 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Process question re. autofocus bug status [was Re: autofocus on links is missing?] (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Now: ISSUE-204) (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Now: ISSUE-204) (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Now: ISSUE-204) (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: ISSUE-30: Native HTML vs ARIA/XML (Monday, 13 February)
• ISSUE-30: Native HTML vs ARIA/XML (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]] (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: Objection to generator decision (Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey) (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: i18n WG position on Issue-172 "restore <rb> as an optional element" (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]] (Thursday, 9 February)
• Reopen-request - ISSUE-158 (Thursday, 9 February)

Leonard Rosenthol

• RE: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Canvas as input vs. img (was Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]]) (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: Canvas as input vs. img (was Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]]) (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: Canvas as input vs. img (was Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]]) (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: Canvas as input vs. img (was Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]]) (Tuesday, 7 February)

Maciej Stachowiak

• Re: reference in HTML5 differences document. (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: DOM Parsing and Serialization: which W3C WG? [Was: Re: ISSUE-198: innerHTML-patent-policy - Chairs Solicit Proposals] (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: ISSUE-198: innerHTML-patent-policy - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Saturday, 25 February)
• CfC: Adopt time syntax changes from (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Change Proposal for ISSUE-189, was: ISSUE-189: uri-web-prefix - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Tuesday, 21 February)
• ISSUE-199: aria-processing - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Tuesday, 21 February)
• ISSUE-196: ua-http-resp-handling - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Tuesday, 21 February)
• ISSUE-201: canvas-fallback - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Tuesday, 21 February)
• ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Tuesday, 21 February)
• ISSUE-197: accept-file-ext - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Tuesday, 21 February)
• ISSUE-193: inaccessible-example - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Tuesday, 21 February)
• ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: ISSUE-30: Chair review of Instate Longesc Change Propsoal (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: Reminder of the Deadline for reopen requests based on New Information (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: ISSUE-30: Chair review of Instate Longesc Change Propsoal (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Objection to generator decision (Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey) (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: Objection to generator decision (Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-31 / ISSUE-80 validation survey) (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider ISSUE-80 Decision (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]] (Tuesday, 7 February)
• ISSUE-30: Chair review of Instate Longesc Change Propsoal (Monday, 6 February)

Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com

• Re: Process question re. autofocus bug status [was Re: autofocus on links is missing?] (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: ISSUE-200: legend-placement - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: ISSUE-200: legend-placement - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: ISSUE-200: legend-placement - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: ISSUE-185: drop-pubdate - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: ISSUE-185: drop-pubdate - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Monday, 6 February)

Mark Watson

• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Encrypting content stored on untrusted CDNs (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Encrypting content stored on untrusted CDNs (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Encrypting content stored on untrusted CDNs (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Media Stack: closed source only Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Missing hardest parts of actual content protection (was Re: Encrypted Media proposal) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Saturday, 25 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Thursday, 23 February)
• <param> (was Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 22 February)

Matthew Turvey

• Re: Split Issue 30? (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated" Change Proposal for ISSUE-30 (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request] (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request] (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request] (Wednesday, 1 February)

Michael Cooper

• Change proposal for HTML-ISSUE-199 (Thursday, 16 February)

Michael[tm] Smith

• Re: ISSUE-197: accept-file-ext - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 23 February)

Paul Cotton

• RE: ISSUE-134 change proposals review - Part 1 (Tuesday, 28 February)
• RE: ISSUE-189: uri-web-prefix - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 23 February)
• RE: ISSUE-197: accept-file-ext - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Wednesday, 22 February)
• FW: counter proposal for issue 185 (Wednesday, 22 February)
• CfC: Publish ten heartbeat drafts as WDs (Monday, 20 February)
• ISSUE-80: title-alternative - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Wednesday, 15 February)
• ISSUE-134 change proposals review - Part 2 (Wednesday, 15 February)
• ISSUE-134 change proposals review - Part 1 (Wednesday, 15 February)
• RE: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated") (Tuesday, 14 February)
• RE: Change Proposal for Issue 194 (Monday, 13 February)
• RE: re-open request for issue 31 (Saturday, 11 February)

Philippe Le Hegaret

• Re: April face-to-face meetings for HTML and WebApps (Tuesday, 28 February)
• April face-to-face meetings for HTML and WebApps (Monday, 6 February)

Richard Ishida

• i18n WG position on Issue-172 "restore <rb> as an optional element" (Thursday, 9 February)

Richard Schwerdtfeger

• Re: Issue 131 Change Proposal (Friday, 10 February)
• Issue 131 Change Proposals (Friday, 10 February)
• RE: Canvas as input vs. img (was Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]]) (Thursday, 9 February)

Robert O'Callahan

• Re: Encrypting content stored on untrusted CDNs (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 28 February)

Ryosuke Niwa

• Re: Canvas as input vs. img (was Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]]) (Wednesday, 8 February)

Sam Ruby

• Re: FW: Revised Timeline and New Bug Priority Policy (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Chair Review of the Change Proposals for issue 179 (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: proposal for ISSUE-191: replace ins and del elements by an attibute-based solution (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: ISSUE-187: validity-stability - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Tuesday, 28 February)
• ISSUE-200: legend-placement - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: i18n WG position on Issue-172 "restore <rb> as an optional element" (Tuesday, 28 February)
• CfC: Close ISSUE-190 coding-example by Amicable Resolution (Tuesday, 28 February)
• CfC: Close ISSUE-192 title-attribute by Amicable Resolution (Tuesday, 28 February)
• CfC: Close ISSUE-170 rel-uri-valid by Amicable Resolution (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish ten heartbeat drafts as WDs (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish ten heartbeat drafts as WDs (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Sunday, 26 February)
• Chair Review of the Change Proposals for issue 179 (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Review of second reopen request for issue 31b [alt-location] (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: ISSUE-200: legend-placement - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Change Proposal for ISSUE-170, was: ISSUE-170 rel-uri-valid: Chairs Solicit Proposals (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: ISSUE-200: legend-placement - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: ISSUE-200: legend-placement - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Monday, 20 February)
• CfC: Close ISSUE-188: generic-track-format by Amicable Resolution (Monday, 20 February)
• CfC: Close ISSUE-182 footnote-recommendation by Amicable Resolution (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: ISSUE-202: figcaption-words - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: ISSUE-198: innerHTML-patent-policy - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Monday, 20 February)
• ISSUE-131: caret-location-API - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Tuesday, 14 February)
• ISSUE-205: caret-location-API - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: ISSUE-205 opened (Tuesday, 14 February)
• ISSUE-205 opened (was: Issue 131 Change Proposal) (Tuesday, 14 February)
• ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated") (Tuesday, 14 February)
• ISSUE-158: object-content-model - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: i18n WG position on Issue-172 "restore <rb> as an optional element" (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: Change Proposal for ISSUE-170, was: ISSUE-170 rel-uri-valid: Chairs Solicit Proposals (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: Reopen-request - ISSUE-158 (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: Reopen-request - ISSUE-158 (Thursday, 9 February)
• Reminder of the Deadline for reopen requests based on New Information (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Split Issue 30? (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated" Change Proposal) (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Revert Request for r6895 (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Working Group Decision on ISSUE-177: ietf-id-wip (Tuesday, 7 February)

Sharon Newman (COHEN)

• Issue 197 Change Proposal (Thursday, 16 February)

Silvia Pfeiffer

• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Now: ISSUE-204) (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: Change Proposal for Issue 194 (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request] (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request] (Friday, 3 February)

Simon Pieters

• Re: Process question re. autofocus bug status [was Re: autofocus on links is missing?] (Monday, 27 February)

Smylers

• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated" Change Proposal) (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request] (Thursday, 2 February)

Steve Faulkner

• Re: reference in HTML5 differences document. (Wednesday, 29 February)
• reference in HTML5 differences document. (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Sunday, 26 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Sunday, 26 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Sunday, 26 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Sunday, 26 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Sunday, 26 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Request to Reconsider Alt Guidance Location (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: ISSUE-199: aria-processing - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Reminder of the Deadline for reopen requests based on New Information (Friday, 17 February)
• Fwd: questions arising from AT vendor in regards to Mozillas implementation of the canvas subdom (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Split Issue 30? (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: re-open request for issue 31 (Saturday, 11 February)
• re-open request for issue 31 (Saturday, 11 February)
• Re: Reminder of the Deadline for reopen requests based on New Information (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]] (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: Using @aria-describedby for long described image links [Was: Using an image map for long described image links [Was: Revert Request]] (Thursday, 2 February)
• Issue 193 change proposal: Remove CSS example that promotes inaccessible content (Wednesday, 1 February)

Tab Atkins Jr.

• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Arbitrary codecs and encryption schemes, was: Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Thursday, 23 February)

Tony Ross

• RE: DOM Parsing and Serialization: which W3C WG? [Was: Re: ISSUE-198: innerHTML-patent-policy - Chairs Solicit Proposals] (Tuesday, 28 February)
• RE: ISSUE-198: innerHTML-patent-policy - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Saturday, 25 February)

Vickers, Mark

• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Saturday, 25 February)

Last message date: Wednesday, 29 February 2012 23:17:49 UTC