W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2012

Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)

From: Kornel Lesiński <kornel@geekhood.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:47:28 -0000
To: public-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.wac5telate2ec8@aimac.local>
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:45:41 -0000, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>  
wrote:

> I mean that browser integration with a CDM is easier than browser  
> integration with a full-fledged plugin, because the functionality of the  
> CDM is so much more constrained.

Will there be a specified, interoperable CDM communication interface that  
browsers can implement?

Current proposal defines how JS communicates with a browser, but IMHO has  
only very vague top-level overview how browser might communicate with a  
CDM.

-- 
regards, Kornel Lesiński
Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2012 00:47:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:30 UTC