Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)

On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:
> You over-generalize when you
> imply that one such restrictive license effectively prohibits a meaningful
> use of a mechanism with a non-restrictive policy.

What would be a meaningful use of the proposed mechanism with a
non-restrictive policy? (HTML5 video already supports cases where the
user is not treated as an adversary.)

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/

Received on Saturday, 25 February 2012 18:55:35 UTC