W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2012

Re: Open Source implementations Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:45:24 -0700
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+d_xcB9JnNkkjmhxmpe1o+8RubdnabFiJ=x4kH-fwpyQw@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-html@w3.org
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:09 AM, Smylers <Smylers@stripey.com> wrote:

> Could we at least focus on web (delivered over the internet)
> requirements first, and try to come up with something which works well
> for those?
>

I will only say that builders of smart TVs and other devices that employ
and support HTML in this fashion consider their devices to be "on the web",
regardless of how data is transported or whether the (embedded) browser
supports only a subset of HTML. In fact, most of these devices *are* using
IP. Further, show me *any* browser that supports all of HTML5 -- there
aren't any.

So whether a smart TV employs walled garden HTML in some cases or arbitrary
HTML in others does not mean it is not part of the web. Using web
technology makes it part of the web.
Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 16:46:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:46 GMT