- From: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:19:58 -0800
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
The issue is very much about whether hidden should mean irrelevant. You couldn't have used a better word. Shadow dom semantics are starting to creep up. @shadow is something to consider. I'm feeling a vibe. -Charles On Feb 14, 2012, at 6:13 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > On Mon, 13 Feb 2012, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >> >> I think this is what Jonas is proposing - behavior for @hidden elements >> that would not apply to content which is set to display: none in other >> ways. I don't think be advocates changing behavior for display: none >> content in any way. > > I don't think it would make sense for content that is marked up as > relevant (not hidden="") but happens to be display:none to be less > accessible than content that is marked as irrelevant (hidden="") and thus > display:none, FWIW. > > -- > Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL > http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. > Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' >
Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2012 02:20:27 UTC