- From: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:38:36 -0800
- To: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
- CC: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, public-html@w3.org
On 2/13/2012 12:57 PM, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote: >> Specifically, describedby is >> > intended for content that is to be read automatically as it is >> > encountered. > That seems like critical information about aria-describedby. If that's > the PF's position, why doesn't the formal definition of > aria-describedby say that: > > http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria/states_and_properties#aria-describedby aria-flowto is closer to what you're thinking of. And I documented that in my response to the AAP. aria-flowto would allow the reader to go down two paths (or multiple paths). We've not yet had a long and wonderful discussion about choose-your-adventure DOM navigation. -Charles
Received on Monday, 13 February 2012 21:39:06 UTC