W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2012

Re: ISSUE-200: legend-placement - Chairs Solicit Proposals

From: Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com <mtanalin@yandex.ru>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 04:45:21 +0400
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: public-html@w3.org
Message-Id: <348131329785121@web57.yandex.ru>
Thanks for clarification. Well, if it's required for considering the issue at all, I would like to try to create proposal in nearest 2-3 days (this may be treated as my request to extend period for issue 200). Thanks.

P.S. To make it more clear for future tracker requests by others, it maybe makes sense to specify formal-proposal requirement briefly right inside _mailing-list message_ created once issue is raised. Decision-policy document, while maybe formally sufficient, seems to be too verbose and not enough clear for third-party people who raise issues for the first time (like me). Thanks.

21.02.2012, 04:29, "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>:
> On 02/20/2012 07:06 PM, Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com wrote:
>> Could you specify what does this mean?
>> What change proposals are assumed? From who?
>> Isn't raising issue itself a sufficient action by bug-reporter?
>> Thanks.
> Here's a description of what is expected in a change proposal:
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html#change-proposal
> Somebody needs to provide the summary, rationale, proposal details, and
> evaluate the impact of the proposed change. If those had been provided,
> we would ask for alternate or counter proposals. Requests that do not
> provide this information are deferred to whatever might happen to come
> after HTML5.
> If somebody plans to work on this, and needs a small extension, they
> should make a request now. The longer it goes, the less likely the
> chairs are to grant such an extension.
> - Sam Ruby
>> 21.02.2012, 03:56, "Sam Ruby"<rubys@intertwingly.net>:
>>> On 01/17/2012 09:49 AM, Paul Cotton wrote:
>>>> 'Allow wrapping LEGEND (or new iLEGEND) in non-FIELDSET elements'
>>>> Per the HTML WG Decision Policy, at this time the chairs would like
>>>> to solicit volunteers to write Change Proposals for ISSUE-200:
>>>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/200
>>>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html#escalation
>>>> If no Change Proposals are written by February 16th, 2012, this
>>>> issue will be closed without prejudice.
>>> As we have received no change proposals, we are now marking this issue
>>> as closed without prejudice.
>>>> Issue status link:
>>>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html#ISSUE-200
>>>> /paulc HTML WG co-chair
>>>> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E
>>>> 6A3 Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329
>>> - Sam Ruby
Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2012 00:45:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:20 UTC