W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2012

Re: Request to re-open issue 131 -USE CASES, USE CASES, USE CASES

From: Frank Olivier <Frank.Olivier@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 00:29:20 +0000
To: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
CC: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, "chuck@jumis.com" <chuck@jumis.com>, Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com>, david bolter <david.bolter@gmail.com>, David Bolter <dbolter@mozilla.com>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "public-canvas-api@w3.org" <public-canvas-api@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "public-html-a11y@w3.org" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Message-ID: <25C818FB-2410-4E32-95D1-F8E5890FDFB9@microsoft.com>
I don't understand - What would a valid use case for nesting canvas elements? In my opinion, this would not be a valid case...

On 15 Jan 2012, at 07:08, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:

* Especially, bearing in mind that <canvas> objects could be nested
and that events could be forwarded outside of the <canvas>, is there
any way of determining what <canvas> element received the forwarded
Received on Thursday, 2 February 2012 00:30:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:20 UTC