- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:36:51 +1100
- To: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
- CC: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, public-html@w3.org
Jonas Sicking: >> It appears we simply do not agree on how a number of issues (probably >> including which issues we don't agree on:-) ) so I suspect this >> thread won't go any further. Charles Pritchard: > I think we've reached an agreement regarding your proposal: @hidden > currently follows display: none, from CSSOM and your proposal seeks to > have @hidden have its own properties. > I now understand that you are not trying to alter "display: none" from > CSSOM. CSSOM seems entirely irrelevant here. CSSOM is the spec that defines scripted access to CSS style sheets etc. Maybe by "@hidden currently follows display: none, from CSSOM" you mean "@hidden is currently defined to hide elements by setting their display property to none through a user agent style sheet".
Received on Monday, 13 February 2012 05:37:38 UTC