@headers Wiki page Laura Carlson (Friday, 26 September)
- Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) James Craig (Tuesday, 23 September)
- Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) Joshue O Connor (Tuesday, 23 September)
- Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) Laura Carlson (Tuesday, 23 September)
- Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) Henri Sivonen (Tuesday, 23 September)
- Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) Joshue O Connor (Tuesday, 23 September)
- Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) Leif Halvard Silli (Tuesday, 23 September)
- Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) Henri Sivonen (Wednesday, 24 September)
- Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) Steven Faulkner (Wednesday, 24 September)
- Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) Laura Carlson (Wednesday, 24 September)
- Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) Joshue O Connor (Thursday, 25 September)
- Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) Henri Sivonen (Thursday, 25 September)
- Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) Joshue O Connor (Thursday, 25 September)
- Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) Henri Sivonen (Thursday, 25 September)
- Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) Gez Lemon (Thursday, 25 September)
- Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) Laura Carlson (Thursday, 25 September)
- Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) James Graham (Thursday, 25 September)
- Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) James Graham (Thursday, 25 September)
- Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) Gez Lemon (Thursday, 25 September)
- Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) James Graham (Thursday, 25 September)
- Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) James Graham (Thursday, 25 September)
- Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) Gez Lemon (Friday, 26 September)
- Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) Ben Millard (Friday, 26 September)
- Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) Simon Pieters (Friday, 26 September)
- Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) Gez Lemon (Friday, 26 September)
- dir=rtl and table header algorithm (was: Re: function and impacts) Simon Pieters (Friday, 26 September)
- Re: dir=rtl and table header algorithm (was: Re: function and impacts) Gez Lemon (Friday, 26 September)
- Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) Ben Millard (Friday, 26 September)
- Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) Gez Lemon (Thursday, 25 September)
- Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) Henri Sivonen (Thursday, 25 September)
- Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) Steven Faulkner (Thursday, 25 September)
- Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) Henri Sivonen (Thursday, 25 September)
- Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) Steven Faulkner (Thursday, 25 September)
Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) Ben Millard (Tuesday, 23 September)
Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) Gez Lemon (Tuesday, 23 September)
Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) Leif Halvard Silli (Tuesday, 23 September)
Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) Ben Millard (Friday, 26 September)
Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] Lachlan Hunt (Wednesday, 3 September)
- Re: several messages Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 2 September)
- Re: several messages Jirka Kosek (Tuesday, 2 September)
- Re: several messages Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 2 September)
- the "special" doctype (ISSUE-54), was: several messages Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 2 September)
- Re: several messages Jirka Kosek (Tuesday, 2 September)
- Re: several messages Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 2 September)
- Re: several messages Leif Halvard Silli (Wednesday, 3 September)
- Re: several messages Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 3 September)
- Re: several messages Leif Halvard Silli (Wednesday, 3 September)
- Re: several messages Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 3 September)
- Re: several messages Ben Millard (Wednesday, 3 September)
- Re: several messages Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 3 September)
- Re: several messages Lachlan Hunt (Wednesday, 3 September)
- Re: several messages Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 3 September)
- Re: several messages Thomas Broyer (Wednesday, 3 September)
- Re: several messages Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 3 September)
- Re: several messages Michael(tm) Smith (Thursday, 4 September)
- new XSLT output methods, was: several messages Julian Reschke (Thursday, 4 September)
- Re: new XSLT output methods, was: several messages Thomas Broyer (Thursday, 4 September)
- Re: new XSLT output methods, was: several messages Julian Reschke (Thursday, 4 September)
- Re: new XSLT output methods, was: several messages Michael(tm) Smith (Thursday, 4 September)
- Re: new XSLT output methods, was: several messages Boris Zbarsky (Thursday, 4 September)
- Re: new XSLT output methods, was: several messages Boris Zbarsky (Thursday, 4 September)
- Re: new XSLT output methods, was: several messages Julian Reschke (Thursday, 4 September)
- Re: new XSLT output methods, was: several messages Boris Zbarsky (Thursday, 4 September)
- Re: new XSLT output methods, was: several messages Julian Reschke (Thursday, 4 September)
- Re: several messages Jirka Kosek (Wednesday, 3 September)
- Re: several messages Jirka Kosek (Wednesday, 3 September)
- Re: several messages Anne van Kesteren (Wednesday, 3 September)
- Re: several messages Jirka Kosek (Wednesday, 3 September)
- new XSLT output methods, was: several messages Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 3 September)
- Re: several messages Lachlan Hunt (Wednesday, 3 September)
- Re: several messages Jirka Kosek (Wednesday, 3 September)
- new XSLT output methods, was: several messages Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 3 September)
- Re: new XSLT output methods, was: several messages Jirka Kosek (Wednesday, 3 September)
- RE: several messages Justin James (Wednesday, 3 September)
- Re: several messages Leif Halvard Silli (Thursday, 4 September)
Re: several messages Leif Halvard Silli (Wednesday, 3 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Maurice (Monday, 1 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Sam Kuper (Monday, 1 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Lachlan Hunt (Monday, 1 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Philip TAYLOR (Monday, 1 September)
- RE: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Justin James (Monday, 1 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Leif Halvard Silli (Monday, 1 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Lachlan Hunt (Monday, 1 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Leif Halvard Silli (Monday, 1 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Smylers (Tuesday, 2 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Leif Halvard Silli (Tuesday, 2 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Smylers (Tuesday, 2 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Lachlan Hunt (Wednesday, 3 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Leif Halvard Silli (Wednesday, 3 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Dave Singer (Wednesday, 3 September)
- RE: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Justin James (Thursday, 4 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Henri Sivonen (Thursday, 4 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Ben Boyle (Thursday, 4 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Henri Sivonen (Thursday, 4 September)
- RE: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> John Foliot (Thursday, 4 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Dave Singer (Tuesday, 9 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> David Poehlman (Thursday, 4 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Cindy Sue Causey (Thursday, 4 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Eric Carlson (Thursday, 4 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Henri Sivonen (Friday, 5 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Eric Carlson (Friday, 5 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Henri Sivonen (Sunday, 7 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Dave Singer (Tuesday, 9 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Leif Halvard Silli (Tuesday, 9 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Dave Singer (Tuesday, 9 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Henri Sivonen (Wednesday, 10 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Lachlan Hunt (Thursday, 4 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis (Thursday, 4 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Lachlan Hunt (Thursday, 4 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> David Poehlman (Thursday, 4 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Lachlan Hunt (Thursday, 4 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> David Poehlman (Thursday, 4 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Lachlan Hunt (Thursday, 4 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> David Poehlman (Thursday, 4 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Lachlan Hunt (Thursday, 4 September)
- RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) John Foliot (Friday, 5 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? Lachlan Hunt (Friday, 5 September)
- RE: Is longdesc a good solution? John Foliot (Friday, 5 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? Lachlan Hunt (Friday, 5 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? David Poehlman (Saturday, 6 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? Lachlan Hunt (Saturday, 6 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? Steven Faulkner (Saturday, 6 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? Lachlan Hunt (Saturday, 6 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? Steven Faulkner (Saturday, 6 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? Lachlan Hunt (Saturday, 6 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? Steven Faulkner (Saturday, 6 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? Steven Faulkner (Saturday, 6 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? David Poehlman (Saturday, 6 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? Laura Carlson (Saturday, 6 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? Joshue O Connor (Saturday, 6 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? Steven Faulkner (Saturday, 6 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? Joshue O Connor (Saturday, 6 September)
- RE: Is longdesc a good solution? Justin James (Saturday, 6 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? Lachlan Hunt (Saturday, 6 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? Laura Carlson (Saturday, 6 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? Geoffrey Sneddon (Saturday, 6 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? Steven Faulkner (Saturday, 6 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? Laura Carlson (Saturday, 6 September)
- RE: Is longdesc a good solution? Justin James (Sunday, 7 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? David Poehlman (Saturday, 6 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? David Poehlman (Saturday, 6 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) James Craig (Friday, 5 September)
- RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Justin James (Friday, 5 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) James Craig (Saturday, 6 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Leif Halvard Silli (Saturday, 6 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) James Craig (Sunday, 7 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Leif Halvard Silli (Sunday, 7 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) James Craig (Monday, 8 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Leif Halvard Silli (Monday, 8 September)
- RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) John Foliot (Saturday, 6 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Henri Sivonen (Sunday, 7 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) David Poehlman (Sunday, 7 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Henri Sivonen (Sunday, 7 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Henri Sivonen (Sunday, 7 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Leif Halvard Silli (Sunday, 7 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Lachlan Hunt (Sunday, 7 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Leif Halvard Silli (Monday, 8 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Henri Sivonen (Monday, 8 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) David Poehlman (Monday, 8 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Robert J Burns (Monday, 8 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Matt Morgan-May (Monday, 8 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Henri Sivonen (Tuesday, 9 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) David Poehlman (Tuesday, 9 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Leif Halvard Silli (Tuesday, 9 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Leif Halvard Silli (Tuesday, 9 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) David Poehlman (Tuesday, 9 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Leif Halvard Silli (Tuesday, 9 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) David Poehlman (Tuesday, 9 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) (Tuesday, 9 September)
- RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Justin James (Tuesday, 9 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) (Tuesday, 9 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Leif Halvard Silli (Wednesday, 10 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) David Poehlman (Wednesday, 10 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Robert J Burns (Tuesday, 9 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Matt Morgan-May (Tuesday, 9 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Henri Sivonen (Wednesday, 10 September)
- RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) John Foliot (Wednesday, 10 September)
- RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) John Foliot (Sunday, 7 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Lachlan Hunt (Sunday, 7 September)
- RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) John Foliot (Monday, 8 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) James Craig (Monday, 8 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Lachlan Hunt (Monday, 8 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) David Poehlman (Monday, 8 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Robert J Burns (Monday, 8 September)
- Is CHOICE a good solution? (was RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>)) John Foliot (Monday, 8 September)
- Minor clarrification : Is CHOICE a good solution? (was RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>)) John Foliot (Monday, 8 September)
- Re: Is CHOICE a good solution? (was RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>)) James Craig (Monday, 8 September)
- RE: Is CHOICE a good solution? (was RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>)) John Foliot (Monday, 8 September)
- Re: Is CHOICE a good solution? (was RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>)) Ben Boyle (Tuesday, 9 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Leif Halvard Silli (Monday, 8 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Robert J Burns (Monday, 8 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Henri Sivonen (Monday, 8 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) David Poehlman (Monday, 8 September)
- RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Justin James (Monday, 8 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? Leif Halvard Silli (Friday, 5 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? Lachlan Hunt (Friday, 5 September)
- Re: Is longdesc a good solution? Leif Halvard Silli (Friday, 5 September)
- @longdesc - starting over (was RE: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) John Foliot (Saturday, 6 September)
- Re: @longdesc - starting over (was RE: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Lachlan Hunt (Saturday, 6 September)
- Re: @longdesc - starting over (was RE: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Philip TAYLOR (Saturday, 6 September)
- Re: @longdesc - starting over (was RE: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) David Poehlman (Saturday, 6 September)
- RE: @longdesc - starting over (was RE: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) John Foliot (Saturday, 6 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Leif Halvard Silli (Thursday, 4 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> David Poehlman (Friday, 5 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Leif Halvard Silli (Friday, 5 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> David Poehlman (Friday, 5 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Lachlan Hunt (Friday, 5 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> James Craig (Friday, 5 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Leif Halvard Silli (Saturday, 6 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Dave Singer (Tuesday, 9 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Lachlan Hunt (Wednesday, 10 September)
- Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Henri Sivonen (Thursday, 11 September)
- Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) T.V Raman (Thursday, 11 September)
- Re: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Philip TAYLOR (Thursday, 11 September)
- Re: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Jan Richards (Thursday, 11 September)
- Re: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) T.V Raman (Thursday, 11 September)
- Re: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Joseph Scheuhammer (Friday, 12 September)
- Re: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Dave Singer (Thursday, 11 September)
- Re: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Henri Sivonen (Friday, 12 September)
- Re: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Lachlan Hunt (Friday, 12 September)
- Re: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Dave Singer (Thursday, 11 September)
- RE: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Dailey, David P. (Friday, 12 September)
- Re: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Charles McCathieNevile (Thursday, 11 September)
- RE: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Justin James (Friday, 12 September)
- Re: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Henri Sivonen (Friday, 12 September)
- RE: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Justin James (Friday, 12 September)
- Re: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) William Loughborough (Friday, 12 September)
- RE: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Dailey, David P. (Friday, 12 September)
- RE: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Schnabel, Stefan (Friday, 12 September)
- Re: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) Al Gilman (Friday, 12 September)
- Accessibility for the Media Elements in HTML5[1][2] Robert J Burns (Friday, 12 September)
- Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Leif Halvard Silli (Tuesday, 2 September)
Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Robert J Burns (Tuesday, 2 September)
RE: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> Justin James (Tuesday, 2 September)
Last message date: Tuesday, 30 September 2008 23:58:34 UTC