Re: several messages

Lachlan Hunt wrote:
> Ian Hickson wrote:
>> I tend to agree. But software can be updated on its own; XSLT is a 
>> standard and we don't know if it will be updated. So in the meantime 
>> it does make sense to make an effort to address the issue. We can 
>> always change it later.
> 
> Have those people who've been pushing for this change actually 
> approached the appropriate WG about updating XSLT to allow <!DOCTYPE 
> htmL> to be emitted?  If not, might I suggest that you actually do so, 
> so that we really don't need to keep "XSLT-compat" in the long term?

The current charter (<http://www.w3.org/2006/06/XML/xsl.html>) doesn't 
seem to include maintenance work on XSLT 1.0.

BR, Julian

(and yes, I'll try to contact them)