public-html@w3.org from September 2008 by author

Adam Barth

• Re: Question about origin serialization (Saturday, 27 September)

Al Gilman

• minor tweak to FYI PFWG F2F topics of potential interest (Tuesday, 30 September)
• FYI PFWG F2F topics of potential interest (Tuesday, 30 September)
• function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Sunday, 14 September)
• Re: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Friday, 12 September)
• Why the curly braces are not solving a real problem [was: Re: Mandatory and Important] (Wednesday, 10 September)

Alexey Proskuryakov

• Re: Unsupported transport-layer encodings (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: Unsupported transport-layer encodings (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: Unsupported transport-layer encodings (Tuesday, 2 September)

Andrew Sidwell

• Re: Is "breaking the Web" with HTML 5 a non issue? (Monday, 22 September)
• Re: Is "breaking the Web" with HTML 5 a non issue? (Monday, 22 September)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: Question about origin serialization (Saturday, 27 September)
• Re: No tabbed browsing in HTML 5? (Friday, 19 September)
• willValidate and image controls (Tuesday, 16 September)
• HTMLOptionElement constructor (Saturday, 13 September)
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: fragid navigation and pct-encoded (Thursday, 4 September)
• fragid navigation and pct-encoded (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: What namespace features popular SVG tools really emit (ISSUE-37) (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: What namespace features popular SVG tools really emit (ISSUE-37) (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: What namespace features popular SVG tools really emit (ISSUE-37) (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: several messages (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: Unsupported transport-layer encodings (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? (Monday, 1 September)

Ben Boyle

• Re: Is CHOICE a good solution? (was RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>)) (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Thursday, 4 September)

Ben Millard

• Re: FYI PFWG F2F topics of potential interest (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: Draft agenda, Oct. 23-24 face-to-face meeting (Wednesday, 10 September)
• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: several messages (Wednesday, 3 September)

Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis

• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Thursday, 4 September)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: Question about origin serialization (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: Question about origin serialization (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: Question about origin serialization (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: Question about origin serialization (Saturday, 27 September)
• Re: Question about origin serialization (Saturday, 27 September)
• Re: Question about origin serialization (Friday, 26 September)
• Question about origin serialization (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: Is "breaking the Web" with HTML 5 a non issue? (Monday, 22 September)
• Re: Is "breaking the Web" with HTML 5 a non issue? (Monday, 22 September)
• Re: No tabbed browsing in HTML 5? (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: No tabbed browsing in HTML 5? (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: No tabbed browsing in HTML 5? (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: new XSLT output methods, was: several messages (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: new XSLT output methods, was: several messages (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: new XSLT output methods, was: several messages (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: Quirks mode vs. standards mode (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Wednesday, 3 September)

Brian Long

• HTML5 non-accessibility? (Saturday, 13 September)

bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

• [Bug 6127] New: Deal with origin details in WebSocket and postMessage feedback (Tuesday, 30 September)
• [Bug 6104] New: <video> and <audio> should prevent cross-origin media loads (Monday, 22 September)
• [Bug 6103] New: video section editorial issues (Monday, 22 September)
• [Bug 6102] New: Please do not break applet element in HTML 5 (Sunday, 21 September)
• [Bug 6101] New: media elements - ready states - events should be async (Saturday, 20 September)
• [Bug 6100] New: Process MessagePort feedback (Friday, 19 September)
• [Bug 6099] New: Process notification feedback (Friday, 19 September)
• [Bug 6098] New: input type=foo as an element-level section (Friday, 19 September)
• [Bug 6097] New: <body background> is a URL attribute? (Friday, 19 September)
• [Bug 6057] New: in the audio portion of the spec, at the end of 4.7.8.0 it mentions "If the src argument is present..." but the example given calls it the argument 'url' (Friday, 12 September)
• [Bug 6052] New: Should propagate uncaught exceptions from workers to their owner (Wednesday, 10 September)
• [Bug 6038] New: "noframes", "script", "style", "title" in 'after head' mode pop prematurely (Monday, 8 September)
• [Bug 6037] New: Elaborate on Web compat characteristics of task queue interaction (Monday, 8 September)
• [Bug 6036] New: HTMLCollection.namedItem() should look for non-HTML elements (Sunday, 7 September)
• [Bug 6035] New: Process appcache feedback (Sunday, 7 September)
• [Bug 6034] New: Process <video> feedback (Sunday, 7 September)
• [Bug 6033] New: Forms section (Sunday, 7 September)
• [Bug 6032] New: Serializing a doctype with invalid public id (Sunday, 7 September)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: SVG Semantics Re: SVG and MathML in text/html (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: SVG Semantics Re: SVG and MathML in text/html (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: SVG Semantics Re: SVG and MathML in text/html (Sunday, 28 September)
• Re: Dirac 1.0.0 released. Comments? (Sunday, 28 September)
• Re: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Friday, 12 September)
• Re: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Thursday, 11 September)
• Re: Editor skills and funding (was: Looking for more editors and Editors) (Monday, 1 September)

Chris Wilson

• RE: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. (Tuesday, 16 September)
• RE: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. (Wednesday, 3 September)
• RE: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. (Wednesday, 3 September)

Cindy Sue Causey

• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Thursday, 4 September)

Dailey, David P.

• RE: SVG Semantics Re: SVG and MathML in text/html (Sunday, 28 September)
• RE: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Friday, 12 September)
• RE: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Friday, 12 September)
• RE: What namespace features popular SVG tools really emit (ISSUE-37) (Wednesday, 3 September)
• RE: What namespace features popular SVG tools really emit (ISSUE-37) (Wednesday, 3 September)

Dan Connolly

• Re: Is "breaking the Web" with HTML 5 a non issue? (Monday, 22 September)
• Re: Is "breaking the Web" with HTML 5 a non issue? (Monday, 22 September)
• Re: profile attribute and conformance (copy-and-paste details) (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: Comparing conformance requirements against real-world docs (Wednesday, 3 September)

Dave Singer

• Re: Dirac 1.0.0 released. Comments? (Friday, 19 September)
• State transitions for media elements (Friday, 19 September)
• Buffered bytes for media elements (Friday, 19 September)
• Pause on exit from Cue Ranges (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Friday, 12 September)
• RE: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Friday, 12 September)
• Re: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Thursday, 11 September)
• Re: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Thursday, 11 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Wednesday, 3 September)

David Poehlman

• Re: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Wednesday, 10 September)
• Re: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Wednesday, 10 September)
• Re: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Wednesday, 10 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Wednesday, 10 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Sunday, 7 September)
• Re: @longdesc - starting over (was RE: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Thursday, 4 September)

Dean Edridge

• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Tuesday, 2 September)

Dominique Hazael-Massieux

• W3C Workshop on Security for Access to Device APIs - London, December 10-11 (Tuesday, 30 September)

Dr. Olaf Hoffmann

• Re: Is "breaking the Web" with HTML 5 a non issue? (Tuesday, 23 September)

Eric Carlson

• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Thursday, 4 September)

Erik Dahlström

• Re: What namespace features popular SVG tools really emit (ISSUE-37) (Wednesday, 3 September)

Felix Sasaki

• Re: conformance checker for HTML+ARIA? (Tuesday, 30 September)

Geoffrey Sneddon

• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: Is "breaking the Web" with HTML 5 a non issue? (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)

Gez Lemon

• Re: dir=rtl and table header algorithm (was: Re: function and impacts) (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: contrived data table example (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: contrived data table example (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. (Friday, 5 September)

Hallvord R. M. Steen

• Re: No tabbed browsing in HTML 5? (Friday, 19 September)

hallvord@opera.com

• Re: No tabbed browsing in HTML 5? (Thursday, 18 September)

Henri Sivonen

• Re: SVG Semantics Re: SVG and MathML in text/html (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: conformance checker for HTML+ARIA? (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: contrived data table example (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: <style scoped> and semi-transparent content models (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Friday, 12 September)
• Re: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Friday, 12 September)
• Re: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Friday, 12 September)
• Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Thursday, 11 September)
• Re: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Thursday, 11 September)
• Re: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Wednesday, 10 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Wednesday, 10 September)
• Re: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Wednesday, 10 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Wednesday, 10 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Sunday, 7 September)
• Re: profile attribute and conformance [was: Comparing conformance requirements against real-world docs] (Sunday, 7 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Sunday, 7 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Sunday, 7 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Sunday, 7 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: profile attribute and conformance [was: Comparing conformance requirements against real-world docs] (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: profile attribute and conformance [was: Comparing conformance requirements against real-world docs] (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: What namespace features popular SVG tools really emit (ISSUE-37) (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: What namespace features popular SVG tools really emit (ISSUE-37) (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: Comparing conformance requirements against real-world docs (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: Comparing conformance requirements against real-world docs (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: What namespace features popular SVG tools really emit (ISSUE-37) (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: Accessibility of <audio> and <video> (Tuesday, 2 September)

Ian Hickson

• Re: Question about origin serialization (Saturday, 27 September)
• Re: Question about origin serialization (Saturday, 27 September)
• Re: Question about origin serialization (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: longdesc="" in HTML5 (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: longdesc="" in HTML5 (Sunday, 7 September)
• longdesc="" in HTML5 (Sunday, 7 September)
• Re: What namespace features popular SVG tools really emit (ISSUE-37) (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: several messages (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: several messages (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: several messages (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: several messages (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: several messages (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: several messages (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: Unsupported transport-layer encodings (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: HTML 5 draft copyright? (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: Unsupported transport-layer encodings (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: Unsupported transport-layer encodings (Monday, 1 September)
• Looking for more editors (Monday, 1 September)

James Craig

• Re: @headers Wiki page (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: Is CHOICE a good solution? (was RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>)) (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Sunday, 7 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Friday, 5 September)

James Graham

• Re: SVG Semantics Re: SVG and MathML in text/html (Sunday, 28 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Thursday, 25 September)

Jan Richards

• Re: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Thursday, 11 September)

Jeff Schiller

• Re: What namespace features popular SVG tools really emit (ISSUE-37) (Wednesday, 3 September)

Jim Jewett

• 4.3 Source fallback (Saturday, 13 September)
• Re: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Thursday, 11 September)
• longdesc in the wild [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Tuesday, 9 September)
• acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Tuesday, 9 September)

Jirka Kosek

• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: new XSLT output methods, was: several messages (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: several messages (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: several messages (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: several messages (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: several messages (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: several messages (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: several messages (Tuesday, 2 September)

John C. Vernaleo

• Re: No tabbed browsing in HTML 5? (Thursday, 18 September)

John Foliot

• RE: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Friday, 12 September)
• RE: longdesc in the wild [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Thursday, 11 September)
• Regarding Transcriptions/Captions (was RE: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...]) (Wednesday, 10 September)
• RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Wednesday, 10 September)
• RE: Is CHOICE a good solution? (was RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>)) (Monday, 8 September)
• Minor clarrification : Is CHOICE a good solution? (was RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>)) (Monday, 8 September)
• Is CHOICE a good solution? (was RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>)) (Monday, 8 September)
• RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Monday, 8 September)
• Formal Request for Re-Instation of @longdesc into the HTML 5 specification (was RE: How to add/reinstate dropped accessibly features in HTML5 (was Re: longdesc="" in HTML5)) (Sunday, 7 September)
• RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Sunday, 7 September)
• RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Saturday, 6 September)
• RE: @longdesc - starting over (was RE: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Saturday, 6 September)
• @longdesc - starting over (was RE: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Saturday, 6 September)
• RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (Friday, 5 September)
• RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Friday, 5 September)
• RE: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Thursday, 4 September)

Jonas Sicking

• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Friday, 5 September)

Joseph Scheuhammer

• Re: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Friday, 12 September)

Joshue O Connor

• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: longdesc="" in HTML5 (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: longdesc="" in HTML5 (Sunday, 7 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Tuesday, 2 September)

Julian Reschke

• Re: function and impacts (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: Is "breaking the Web" with HTML 5 a non issue? (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: new XSLT output methods, was: several messages (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: new XSLT output methods, was: several messages (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: new XSLT output methods, was: several messages (Thursday, 4 September)
• new XSLT output methods, was: several messages (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: What namespace features popular SVG tools really emit (ISSUE-37) (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: What namespace features popular SVG tools really emit (ISSUE-37) (Wednesday, 3 September)
• new XSLT output methods, was: several messages (Wednesday, 3 September)
• new XSLT output methods, was: several messages (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: several messages (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: Limitations of IE8 type-sniffing opt-out (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: several messages (Wednesday, 3 September)
• the "special" doctype (ISSUE-54), was: several messages (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: several messages (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: Looking for more editors (Monday, 1 September)

Justin Anthony Knapp

• Re: No tabbed browsing in HTML 5? (Thursday, 18 September)
• Re: Looking for more editors (Monday, 1 September)

Justin James

• RE: [forms] control_element.value getter/setter newline normalization (Tuesday, 30 September)
• RE: Is "breaking the Web" with HTML 5 a non issue? (Tuesday, 23 September)
• RE: Is "breaking the Web" with HTML 5 a non issue? (Monday, 22 September)
• RE: Is "breaking the Web" with HTML 5 a non issue? (Monday, 22 September)
• RE: Is "breaking the Web" with HTML 5 a non issue? (Monday, 22 September)
• RE: Is "breaking the Web" with HTML 5 a non issue? (Monday, 22 September)
• Is "breaking the Web" with HTML 5 a non issue? (Monday, 22 September)
• RE: No tabbed browsing in HTML 5? (Thursday, 18 September)
• RE: No tabbed browsing in HTML 5? (Thursday, 18 September)
• RE: HTML5 non-accessibility? (Sunday, 14 September)
• RE: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Friday, 12 September)
• RE: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Friday, 12 September)
• RE: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Wednesday, 10 September)
• Overemphasis on screen readers? (Wednesday, 10 September)
• RE: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Wednesday, 10 September)
• RE: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Wednesday, 10 September)
• RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Tuesday, 9 September)
• RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Monday, 8 September)
• RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (Sunday, 7 September)
• RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• RE: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Saturday, 6 September)
• RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Friday, 5 September)
• RE: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Friday, 5 September)
• RE: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Friday, 5 September)
• RE: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Thursday, 4 September)
• RE: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Wednesday, 3 September)
• RE: several messages (Wednesday, 3 September)
• RE: For information : Google to release web browser (Tuesday, 2 September)
• RE: Accessibility of <audio> and <video> (Tuesday, 2 September)
• RE: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Tuesday, 2 September)
• HTML 5 draft copyright? (Tuesday, 2 September)
• RE: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 1 September)
• RE: Looking for more editors (Monday, 1 September)

Karl Dubost

• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Wednesday, 3 September)
• align justify? Re: Comparing conformance requirements against real-world docs (Monday, 1 September)

L. David Baron

• Re: Is "breaking the Web" with HTML 5 a non issue? (Monday, 22 September)

Lachlan Hunt

• Re: No tabbed browsing in HTML 5? (Thursday, 18 September)
• Re: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Friday, 12 September)
• Re: Multimedia Accessibility <Audio> <Video> Wiki Page (Thursday, 11 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Wednesday, 10 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Sunday, 7 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Sunday, 7 September)
• Re: @longdesc - starting over (was RE: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: several messages (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: several messages (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: Accessibility of <audio> and <video> (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 1 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 1 September)
• Re: About video & audio elements (Monday, 1 September)
• Re: About video & audio elements (Monday, 1 September)
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? (Monday, 1 September)

Laura Carlson

• Re: @headers Wiki page (Tuesday, 30 September)
• @headers Wiki page (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: contrived data table example (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: Is "breaking the Web" with HTML 5 a non issue? (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Request for PFWG WAI review of multimedia accessibility requirements <audio> <video> (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: HTML5 non-accessibility? (Sunday, 14 September)
• Re: Multimedia Accessibility <Audio> <Video> Wiki Page (Thursday, 11 September)
• Multimedia Accessibility <Audio> <Video> Wiki Page (Thursday, 11 September)
• Re: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Wednesday, 10 September)
• How to add/reinstate dropped accessibly features in HTML5 (was Re: longdesc="" in HTML5) (Sunday, 7 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. (Friday, 5 September)
• Fwd: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. (Friday, 5 September)
• Editor skills and funding (was: Looking for more editors and Editors) (Monday, 1 September)

Leif Halvard Silli

• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Do we need axis or headers='a-TD-cell' ? (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: Is "breaking the Web" with HTML 5 a non issue? (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: Is "breaking the Web" with HTML 5 a non issue? (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: No tabbed browsing in HTML 5? (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: No tabbed browsing in HTML 5? (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: No tabbed browsing in HTML 5? (Thursday, 18 September)
• Re: No tabbed browsing in HTML 5? (Thursday, 18 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Wednesday, 10 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Long fallback. A problem description. (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Sunday, 7 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Sunday, 7 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: several messages (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: several messages (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: several messages (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: several messages (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 1 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 1 September)
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? (Monday, 1 September)
• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? (Monday, 1 September)

Maciej Stachowiak

• Re: SVG Semantics Re: SVG and MathML in text/html (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: SVG Semantics Re: SVG and MathML in text/html (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: Question about origin serialization (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: SVG Semantics Re: SVG and MathML in text/html (Sunday, 28 September)
• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. (Tuesday, 16 September)
• Re: @headers issue resolved - allowing a td to be referenced by a header to be in the HTMl5 spec. (Tuesday, 16 September)

Manuel Strehl

• Re: What namespace features popular SVG tools really emit (ISSUE-37) (Thursday, 4 September)

Mark Nottingham

• Status of Link header (Friday, 12 September)

Matt Morgan-May

• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Monday, 8 September)

Matthew Raymond

• Dirac 1.0.0 released. Comments? (Thursday, 18 September)
• Re: Accessibility of <audio> and <video> (Tuesday, 2 September)

Maurice

• Re: About video & audio elements (Monday, 1 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 1 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 1 September)

Michael A. Puls II

• [forms] control_element.value getter/setter newline normalization (Tuesday, 30 September)
• [forms] Detailed review of the DOMControlValueChanged and 'input' events (Tuesday, 30 September)

Michael(tm) Smith

• Re: Draft agenda, Oct. 23-24 face-to-face meeting (Thursday, 11 September)
• Draft agenda, Oct. 23-24 face-to-face meeting (Wednesday, 10 September)
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Thursday, 4 September)
• profile attribute and conformance [was: Comparing conformance requirements against real-world docs] (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: new XSLT output methods, was: several messages (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: several messages (Thursday, 4 September)

N-at-Work

• RE: No tabbed browsing in HTML 5? (Friday, 19 September)
• No tabbed browsing in HTML 5? (Thursday, 18 September)

Nicolas LE GALL

• Re: About video & audio elements (Monday, 1 September)

Patrick Garies

• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? (Tuesday, 2 September)

Patty Kostkova

• 2 new posts: Research Assistant/ Research Fellow in Semantic Web/Ontology and Recommender Systems for Live Sciences: Closing Date: 12 September 2008 (Wednesday, 3 September)

Philip Jägenstedt

• Re: State transitions for media elements (Monday, 22 September)

Philip Taylor

• Re: No tabbed browsing in HTML 5? (Thursday, 18 September)
• Re: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Thursday, 11 September)
• Re: @longdesc - starting over (was RE: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Limitations of IE8 type-sniffing opt-out (Thursday, 4 September)
• Limitations of IE8 type-sniffing opt-out (Wednesday, 3 September)
• For information : Google to release web browser (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 1 September)
• Re: Looking for more editors (Monday, 1 September)

Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)

• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Tuesday, 9 September)

Robert J Burns

• Re: HTML5 non-accessibility? (Sunday, 14 September)
• Accessibility for the Media Elements in HTML5[1][2] (Friday, 12 September)
• Re: acceptable fallbacks [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] (Friday, 12 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: longdesc="" in HTML5 (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Tuesday, 2 September)

Robin Berjon

• Re: What namespace features popular SVG tools really emit (ISSUE-37) (Wednesday, 10 September)

Ryan King

• Re: profile attribute and conformance [was: Comparing conformance requirements against real-world docs] (Thursday, 4 September)

Sam Kuper

• Re: Is "breaking the Web" with HTML 5 a non issue? (Monday, 22 September)
• Re: Is "breaking the Web" with HTML 5 a non issue? (Monday, 22 September)
• Re: Is "breaking the Web" with HTML 5 a non issue? (Monday, 22 September)
• Re: Citing multiple <blockquote> elements in HTML5 (Wednesday, 10 September)
• Citing multiple <blockquote> elements in HTML5 (Wednesday, 10 September)
• Re: For information : Google to release web browser (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Monday, 1 September)

Sam Ruby

• Re: Are new void elements really a good idea? (Sunday, 31 August)

Schnabel, Stefan

• RE: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Friday, 12 September)

Sean Hayes

• RE: Multimedia Accessibility <Audio> <Video> Wiki Page (Thursday, 11 September)

Simon Pieters

• dir=rtl and table header algorithm (was: Re: function and impacts) (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Friday, 5 September)
• Quirks mode vs. standards mode (was: Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): ...) (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Wednesday, 3 September)

Smylers

• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Tuesday, 2 September)
• Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video> (Tuesday, 2 September)

stephane.deschamps@orange-ftgroup.com

• RE: No tabbed browsing in HTML 5? (Thursday, 18 September)
• RE: table headers - clear description of problem (Tuesday, 2 September)

Steven Faulkner

• re: contrived data table example (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: function and impacts (was: @scope and @headers reform) (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: longdesc="" in HTML5 (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (Saturday, 6 September)
• Re: table headers - clear description of problem (Tuesday, 2 September)

T.V Raman

• Re: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Thursday, 11 September)
• Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Thursday, 11 September)

Thomas Broyer

• Re: fragid navigation and pct-encoded (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: new XSLT output methods, was: several messages (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: several messages (Wednesday, 3 September)

Thomas Davies

• Re: Dirac 1.0.0 released. Comments? (Wednesday, 24 September)

Toby A Inkster

• Re: profile attribute and conformance [was: Comparing conformance requirements against real-world docs] (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: profile attribute and conformance [was: Comparing conformance requirements against real-world docs] (Friday, 5 September)

William Loughborough

• Re: Privacy implications of automatic alternative selection (Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>) (Friday, 12 September)

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 September 2008 23:58:34 UTC