W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2008

Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>)

From: Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:26:58 +0100
Message-ID: <48C6CE02.9010302@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
To: Justin James <j_james@mindspring.com>
CC: 'David Poehlman' <david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com>, 'Leif Halvard Silli' <lhs@malform.no>, 'Henri Sivonen' <hsivonen@iki.fi>, 'Matt Morgan-May' <mattmay@adobe.com>, 'HTML WG' <public-html@w3.org>, 'W3C WAI-XTECH' <wai-xtech@w3.org>

Yes, I agree that's often what it is used for;
I was more trying to attempt to identify the
purposes to which it /should/ be put ...

Philip TAYLOR
--------
Justin James wrote:
 > Not necessarily. The <object> fallback content is often used as "You need to
 > get the plugin" type of content, which is not a replacement for the content
 > itself.
 >
 > J.Ja
Received on Tuesday, 9 September 2008 19:27:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:23 GMT