Leif wrote: > Ian a short while ago said: "It makes no sense for the spec to advise > someone to not conform to the specification." [1] Likewise it makes > no sense advice to code according HTML 4, if HTML 4 is supposed to be > interpreted as HTML 5. > > With HTML 5, it is proposed that the message becomes: There are > certain things of the past that UAs may forget. Thus HTML 5 actually > is locking things out of the Web. Actively so. Good point. Another example @profile: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Jul/0571.html The editor's atance (drop the attribute): http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2008-May/014692.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2008May/0102.html Among Dan's conclusions: - "use the head/@profile attribute anyway, despite what the HTML 5 spec says." http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/08/the_details_of_data_in_documen.html Best Regards, LauraReceived on Tuesday, 23 September 2008 12:13:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:32:41 GMT