Leif Halvard Silli wrote: > <video>: Would you propose the use of <object> instead of <video> when > HTML fallback for videos is wanted as well? (The current discussion > started with a proposal to add @longdesc to <video>.) No, because <object> lacks the APIs that makes <video> useful, and because, as has already been explained countless times, any alternative content for video should be made available to everyone. Neither longdesc nor <object> fallback successfully meets that condition. The only reasonable solution is to include any alternative content or links to it elsewhere in the page, preferably nearby. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/Received on Sunday, 7 September 2008 19:54:15 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:23 GMT