W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2008

Re: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>)

From: Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:26:41 +0200
Message-ID: <48C695B1.3020608@malform.no>
To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
CC: Matt Morgan-May <mattmay@adobe.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, W3C WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org>

Leif Halvard Silli 2008-09-09 17.20:
   [...]

> A problem is that it might not be "very near" the video. E.g. if the 
> fallback was a manuscript (since transcripts are hard work), then the 
> author might not see a reason to place a link to the transcript 


Sorry, should be "no reason to place a link to the manuscript".

> near the <video> if the link was provided elsewhere.

-- 
leif halvard silli
Received on Tuesday, 9 September 2008 15:27:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:23 GMT