Re: several messages

Ian Hickson 2008-09-03 06.40:

> On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
>> 
>> Plan B:
>> 
>> 	<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC>
>> 	<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "">
>> 
>> Rationale: One DOCTYPE, disguised as two. The simplest way to cater for 
>> all needs without creating confusion.
> 
> We're not adding seven characters to the DOCTYPE just to cater for old 
> software that won't even be a concern by the time the spec is done. That's 
> just not sensible language design.

Would you have suggested to simply use <!DOCTYPE>, if that was the 
shortest string that triggered strict mode? (IE6 does not require 
more than that!)
-- 
leif halvard silli

Received on Thursday, 4 September 2008 15:05:05 UTC