W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2008

profile attribute and conformance [was: Comparing conformance requirements against real-world docs]

From: Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 20:35:42 +0900
To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20080904113542.GB15529@toro.w3.mag.keio.ac.jp>

Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, 2008-09-04 09:35 +0300:

>  On Aug 31, 2008, at 20:23, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> > The profile instances are mostly due to WordPress. The scheme of picking at 
> > most one page per *hostname* still picked a lot of username.wordpress.com 
> > blogs. Also, there are a lot of other WP instances out there. These could 
> > be knocked out by a single WP version update.
>  I was informed off-list that the attribute is part of the WP theme--not WP 
>  itself, and a WP engine update wouldn't change the themes.

So, given that and the other data and viewpoints you've considered
in regard to the profile attribute, what's your current thinking
on it? Do you think it should be allowed or not?


Michael(tm) Smith
Received on Thursday, 4 September 2008 11:36:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:38 UTC