w3c-wai-gl@w3.org from July to September 2003 by date

Wednesday, 1 October 2003

• Use Cases Tom Croucher

Tuesday, 30 September 2003

• Controlled language for WCAG Avi Arditti
• [techs] Techniques teleconference 01 October 2003 Michael Cooper

Monday, 29 September 2003

• Re: Acrobat 6.0 Question Loretta Guarino Reid
• Re: Acrobat 6.0 Question Sailesh Panchang

Sunday, 28 September 2003

• RE: Accesskey: there are "techniques"? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Areas of concern for the cognitively disabled (symbol users) Jonathan Chetwynd
• RE: Accesskey: there are "techniques"? Tom Croucher
• Re: Accesskey: there are "techniques"? Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: Accesskey: there are "techniques"? Gian Sampson-Wild (PurpleTop)
• RE: Accesskey: there are "techniques"? Charles Oppermann

Saturday, 27 September 2003

• RE: Accesskey: there are "techniques"? Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Accesskey: there are "techniques"? Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Accesskey: there are "techniques"? Tom Croucher
• RE: Accesskey: there are "techniques"? Maurizio Vittoria
• RE: Accesskey: there are "techniques"? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Accessible games - advice welcome Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Accesskey: there are "techniques"? Maurizio Boscarol
• 21 and 22 November face-to-face in Tokyo Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: Acrobat 6.0 Question Loretta Guarino Reid
• Re: Acrobat 6.0 Question Loretta Guarino Reid
• Acrobat 6.0 Question Doyle Burnett

Friday, 26 September 2003

• RE: Accesskey: there are "techniques"? Michael Cooper
• Accessible games - advice welcome Marc Walraven
• RE: Accesskey: there are "techniques"? Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Accesskey: there are "techniques"? Tom Croucher
• RE: Accesskey: there are "techniques"? Yvette P. Hoitink
• RE: Areas of concern for the cognitively disabled (symbol users) andy judson
• RE: Accesskey: there are "techniques"? Tom Croucher
• Re: Accesskey: there are "techniques"? Maurizio Boscarol
• RE: Accesskey: there are "techniques"? Gian Sampson-Wild (PurpleTop)

Thursday, 25 September 2003

• 25 Sept WCAG WG telecon summary Wendy A Chisholm
• Need response by 3pm EDT 26 Sept re: meeting in November in Japan Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: Accesskey: there are "techniques"? Charles Oppermann
• Accesskey: there are "techniques"? Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• 24 Sept Techniques Task Force telecon Summary Wendy A Chisholm
• Some comments Sailesh Panchang
• RE: Areas of concern for the cognitively disabled lisa seeman
• Regrets 25 September Roberto Castaldo
• Agenda Gregg Vanderheiden

Wednesday, 24 September 2003

• Action item: Used cases described Sailesh Panchang
• [techs] - questions for rdf techs document lisa seeman
• WCAG theme song hits the charts David MacDonald
• Regrets for 24 sept Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• PlanITROI Weekly Specials 9-23-03 Deals
• RE: FW: [techlunch] Website owners face prosecution Tom Croucher
• Re: FW: [techlunch] Website owners face prosecution Jens Meiert

Tuesday, 23 September 2003

• Reorg 4 Ben Caldwell
• Regrets for This Weeks Teleconference Geoff Deering
• Regrets 24 and 25 September Michael Cooper
• [techs] Techniques teleconference 24 September 2003 Michael Cooper
• FW: [techlunch] Website owners face prosecution John M Slatin

Monday, 22 September 2003

• W3C Weekly News - 20 September 2003 by way of Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: Conformance levels and core /extended - Take 2 Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Conformance levels and core /extended Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: BANNER ADVERTISING AND ACCESSIBILITY John M Slatin
• Re: BANNER ADVERTISING AND ACCESSIBILITY Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: BANNER ADVERTISING AND ACCESSIBILITY John M Slatin
• Re: Conformance levels and core /extended Sailesh Panchang
• RE: Macromedia Flash Ads Geoff Deering
• Re: FW: Ad conformance Jens Meiert

Sunday, 21 September 2003

• Re: FW: Ad conformance Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: FW: Ad conformance Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Macromedia Flash Ads Charles McCathieNevile
• BANNER ADVERTISING AND ACCESSIBILITY Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: Macromedia Flash Ads Geoff Deering
• RE: Macromedia Flash Ads Geoff Deering
• Re: Macromedia Flash Ads Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Macromedia Flash Ads Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Macromedia Flash Ads Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Re: Macromedia Flash Ads Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Macromedia Flash Ads Geoff Deering

Friday, 19 September 2003

• [techs] Summary of Techniques teleconference 17 September 2003 Michael Cooper
• Re: FW: Ad conformance Charles McCathieNevile
• Late regrets Roberto Ellero
• Sept. 18 Mintues Ben Caldwell
• RE: Ad conformance Tom Croucher
• RE: Uk accessibility Survey Tom Croucher
• Re: FW: Ad conformance Jens Meiert
• FW: Ad conformance Gregg Vanderheiden

Thursday, 18 September 2003

• RE: Regrets Gian Sampson-Wild (PurpleTop)
• Regrets for today Avi Arditti
• RE: Conformance levels and core /extended John M Slatin
• RE: Conformance levels and core /extended Gregg Vanderheiden
• Conformance levels and core /extended Sailesh Panchang
• Regrets (was RE: Agenda for Tomorrow) Yvette P. Hoitink
• RE: WCAG2.0 Draft (A Question) Geoff Deering
• FW: Penn State University Rolls Out Web Accessibility Program Gregg Vanderheiden
• FW: * FW: Accessible Websites Gregg Vanderheiden
• Regrets Lee Roberts
• Re: WCAG2.0 Draft (A Question) Sailesh Panchang
• RE: WCAG2.0 Draft (A Question) John M Slatin
• RE: WCAG2.0 Draft (A Question) Geoff Deering
• RE: WCAG2.0 Draft (A Question) Geoff Deering

Wednesday, 17 September 2003

• Agenda for Tomorrow Gregg Vanderheiden
• QA Ops Guidelines and WCAG WG (2nd try) Karl Dubost
• RE: WCAG2.0 Draft (A Question) Tom Croucher
• RE: WCAG2.0 Draft (A Question) John M Slatin
• RE: [Fwd: On reading...] Montgomery, Gordon
• Re: [techs] Techniques teleconference 17 September 2003 Chris Ridpath
• WCAG2.0 Draft (A Question) Geoff Deering
• Regrets, teleconference 17 September 2003 Roberto Ellero
• Uk accessibility survey Tom Croucher

Tuesday, 16 September 2003

• RE: [Fwd: On reading...] Montgomery, Gordon
• RE: [Fwd: On reading...] Tom Croucher
• Re: [Fwd: On reading...] Charles McCathieNevile
• [Fwd: On reading...] Kerstin Goldsmith
• RE: [techs] Summary of Face to Face, 08 and 09 September 2003 Tom Croucher
• [techs] Techniques teleconference 17 September 2003 Michael Cooper
• Re: Conformance levels and best practices Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: Conformance levels and best practices John M Slatin
• Re: Conformance levels and best practices Tom Croucher
• Re: Conformance levels and best practices Jason White

Monday, 15 September 2003

• Conformance levels and best practices Sailesh Panchang
• Requirements for WCAG2 versus actual doc Sailesh Panchang
• RE: Captioned music videos (was: #320 and REF 1.1a ability to be expressed in words) John M Slatin

Saturday, 13 September 2003

• Fourth Annual 'E-Government' Survey: Readability is Problem for State, Federal Government Web Sites Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Re: Captioned music videos (was: #320 and REF 1.1a ability to be expressed in words) Joe Clark
• Re: 19 Jun 2003 - WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes Joe Clark
• Re: Captioning of SIgn language? Joe Clark
• Re: Action item: Re #320 and REF 1.1a ability to be expressed in words Maurizio Vittoria

Friday, 12 September 2003

• Sept. 11 Minutes Ben Caldwell
• Captioning of SIgn language? Gregg Vanderheiden
• Achromatopsia (was: Color) Joe Clark
• Re: [techs] Summary of Face to Face, 08 and 09 September 2003 Joe Clark
• RE: Action item: Re #320 and REF 1.1a ability to be expressed in words John M Slatin
• [techs] Summary of Face to Face, 08 and 09 September 2003 Michael Cooper
• Core WCAG 2.0 vs. Level 2 WCAG 1.0 Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: Action item: Re #320 and REF 1.1a ability to be expressed in words John M Slatin
• Color John M Slatin
• Re: Action item: Re #320 and REF 1.1a ability to be expressed in words Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Re: Action item: Re #320 and REF 1.1a ability to be expressed in words Doyle
• RE: Action item: Re #320 and REF 1.1a ability to be expressed in words Gregg Vanderheiden

Thursday, 11 September 2003

• Today's Audio-Conference (9/11/03) Doyle Burnett
• Action item: Re #320 and REF 1.1a ability to be expressed in words John M Slatin
• RE: Agenda Yvette P. Hoitink
• Re: Screen reader invisibility Ineke van der Maat
• RE: Screen reader invisibility Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Screen reader invisibility John M Slatin
• Re: Agenda Loretta Guarino Reid
• RE: Agenda Gian Sampson-Wild (PurpleTop)
• Re: Agenda Maurizio Vittoria
• Re: Screen reader invisibility Tom Croucher
• Regrets 11 Sept Tom Croucher
• RE: Agenda Lee Roberts
• Agenda Jason White

Wednesday, 10 September 2003

• Screen reader invisibility Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG

Tuesday, 9 September 2003

• W3C Weekly News - 9 September 2003 by way of Wendy A Chisholm

Monday, 8 September 2003

• Reorganization proposal Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: Personae Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: [techs] Use cases for techniques Sailesh Panchang
• Personae Tom Croucher
• Comments on Joe Clark's WCAG review Andrew Kirkpatrick

Sunday, 7 September 2003

• Notes for WCAG f2f @ T.O. Joe Clark

Friday, 5 September 2003

• RE: Checkpoint 3.1 - Identifying language (authoring burden) Y.P. Hoitink
• RE: Checkpoint 3.1 - Identifying language Michael Cooper
• Re: Checkpoint 3.1 - Identifying language (authoring burden) Al Gilman
• WCAG Theme Song for mp3 Download David MacDonald
• apologies for 4 sept Tom Croucher

Thursday, 4 September 2003

• Checkpoint 3.1 - Identifying language Y.P. Hoitink
• late late regrets Matthew Margolin
• late regrets Lee Roberts
• IRC transcript from today's call Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: [TECH] Colour Difference Algorithm Joe Clark
• Regrets for 4 Sept - late Kerstin Goldsmith
• IRC log from 3 Sept techs task force telecon Wendy A Chisholm
• WCAG Theme David MacDonald
• [techs]Gateway doc Sailesh Panchang
• Regrets for 4 Sept - staff meeting Michael Cooper
• [techs] Gateway doc Sailesh Panchang
• RE: [TECH] Colour Difference Algorithm Lee Roberts
• Re: [TECH] Colour Difference Algorithm Chris Ridpath
• Re: Survey: Emoticons for screen readers Jens Meiert
• Re: [techs] Use cases for techniques Joe Clark
• Demarcating URLs (was: This week's agenda) Joe Clark

Wednesday, 3 September 2003

• Re: Survey: Emoticons for screen readers Joe Clark
• W3C Weekly News - 3 September 2003 by way of Wendy A Chisholm
• This week's agenda Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: [techs] Use cases for techniques Michael Cooper
• [TECHS] Longdesc in Frames David MacDonald
• RE: [techs] Use cases for techniques John M Slatin
• [techs] Use cases for techniques Michael Cooper
• RE: Survey: Emoticons for screen readers Gregory J. Rosmaita
• REGRETS - No Message Doyle
• RE: Equation for determining color "closeness" John M Slatin
• Regrets, teleconferences 3-4 September 2003 Roberto Ellero
• Re: Scope of WCAG 2.0 (was: Re: Minor edits to the draft charter) Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Re: Equation for determining color "closeness" Wendy A Chisholm

Tuesday, 2 September 2003

• Re: Scope of WCAG 2.0 (was: Re: Minor edits to the draft charter) Sailesh Panchang
• RE: Scope of WCAG 2.0 (was: Re: Minor edits to the draft charter) John M Slatin
• Re: Scope of WCAG 2.0 (was: Re: Minor edits to the draft charter) Doyle Burnett
• RE: Scope of WCAG 2.0 (was: Re: Minor edits to the draft charter) John M Slatin
• Scope of WCAG 2.0 (was: Re: Minor edits to the draft charter) Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: [TECH] Colour Difference Algorithm Joe Clark
• [techs] EXTENDED Techniques teleconference 03 September 2003 Michael Cooper

Saturday, 30 August 2003

• Re: Equation for determining color "closeness" Roberto Ellero
• RE: The Disunity of W3C Specs Geoff Deering
• Re: The Disunity of W3C Specs Kynn Bartlett
• RE: The Disunity of W3C Specs Geoff Deering
• regrets for Sept 4 Loretta Guarino Reid

Friday, 29 August 2003

• Re: The Disunity of W3C Specs Wendy A Chisholm
• Equation for determining color "closeness" Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: [TECH] Colour Difference Algorithm Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: Cascading Style Sheets (CSS), W3C Pages and Macs Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: Wicked screensaver ij@w3.org
• Re: Cascading Style Sheets (CSS), W3C Pages and Macs Joe Clark

Thursday, 28 August 2003

• irc from today's telecon Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: The Disunity of W3C Specs Geoff Deering
• RE: [320] Ability to be expressed in words Al Gilman
• RE: [320] Ability to be expressed in words Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: [TECH] Colour Difference Algorithm Chris Ridpath
• [#338] Proposed text Michael Cooper
• Your details obecker@informatik.hu-berlin.de
• RE: [TECH] Colour Difference Algorithm Tom Croucher
• Re: [TECH] Colour Difference Algorithm Joe Clark
• Regrets 27/08/2003 - Unavoidabley detained. Tom Croucher

Wednesday, 27 August 2003

• Re: Re: My details ronald@innovation.ch
• Cascading Style Sheets (CSS), W3C Pages and Macs Doyle Burnett
• Re: Re: My details rschloss@us.ibm.com
• W3C Weekly News - 26 August 2003 by way of Wendy A Chisholm
• received your email gstein@lyra.org
• Your details gdaniels@macromedia.com
• RE: Survey: Emoticons for screen readers Michael Cooper
• REGRETS - 8/28/03 (message) Doyle Burnett
• [techs] log from today's telecon Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: Survey: Emoticons for screen readers John M Slatin
• Re: Survey: Emoticons for screen readers Jens Meiert
• Survey: Emoticons for screen readers David MacDonald
• Re: [TECH] Colour Difference Algorithm Chris Ridpath
• Fw: New Version: Web Publishing Accessibility Wizard for MS Office Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• AGENDA and Issue groupings for this week's meeting Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: [techs] EXTENDED Techniques teleconference 27 August 2003 Charles McCathieNevile

Tuesday, 26 August 2003

• RE: WCAG 2.0 -> 3 - Bottom Layer (Server Side Techniques) Geoff Deering
• RE: WCAG 2.0 -> 3 - Bottom Layer (Server Side Techniques) Michael Cooper
• Re: [techs] pronunciation of emoticons and symbols Gregory J. Rosmaita
• Re: [TECH] Colour Difference Algorithm Doyle Burnett
• [techs] EXTENDED Techniques teleconference 27 August 2003 Michael Cooper
• Re: [TECH] Colour Difference Algorithm Joe Clark
• RE: WCAG 2.0 -> 3 - Bottom Layer (Server Side Techniques) Geoff Deering
• action: what happened to "logical, linear, reading order" Ben Caldwell
• Re: WCAG 2.0 -> 3 - Bottom Layer (Server Side Techniques) Al Gilman
• [TECH] Colour Difference Algorithm Chris Ridpath
• RE: WCAG 2.0 -> 3 - Bottom Layer (Server Side Techniques) Geoff Deering
• RE: WCAG 2.0 -> 3 - Bottom Layer (Server Side Techniques) Mirabella, Mathew J
• WCAG 2.0 -> 3 - Bottom Layer (Server Side Techniques) Geoff Deering
• Regrets 8/28 (Not Available/Not Up2Date on WCAG 2.0) Geoff Deering

Monday, 25 August 2003

• RE: [330] Acronyms and abbreviations Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: [330] Acronyms and abbreviations Charles McCathieNevile

Sunday, 24 August 2003

• RE: [320] Ability to be expressed in words Al Gilman
• Re: Jakob Nielsen Column -- PDF: Unfit for Human Consumption Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Re: Jakob Nielsen Column -- PDF: Unfit for Human Consumption Joe Clark
• Re: Conformance Claims Charles McCathieNevile

Saturday, 23 August 2003

• Re: Checking spelling in input areas Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: [TECH] links Y.P. Hoitink
• RE: [320] Ability to be expressed in words Tom Croucher

Thursday, 21 August 2003

• Regrets for 8/21 (no message) Y.P. Hoitink

Wednesday, 20 August 2003

• Apologies Geoff Deering
• [TECH] links David MacDonald

Thursday, 21 August 2003

• Re: [techs] pronunciation of emoticons and symbols Joe Clark

Friday, 22 August 2003

• testing Wendy A Chisholm

Thursday, 21 August 2003

• another minor charter edit Wendy A Chisholm

Saturday, 23 August 2003

• Re: Minor edits to the draft charter Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG

Friday, 22 August 2003

• RE: [320] Ability to be expressed in words John M Slatin

Thursday, 21 August 2003

• Re: [330] Acronyms and abbreviations Joe Clark
• late regrets Lee Roberts

Friday, 22 August 2003

• Checking spelling in input areas Joe Clark

Thursday, 21 August 2003

• Test Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG

Wednesday, 20 August 2003

• RE: Table Techniques - Summary Chris Brainerd

Friday, 22 August 2003

• Lists functioning? Joe Clark
• Conformance vs. Certification Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG

Thursday, 21 August 2003

• Minor edits to the draft charter Wendy A Chisholm

Friday, 22 August 2003

• Re: [320] Ability to be expressed in words Kynn Bartlett

Thursday, 21 August 2003

• [techs] Summary of Techniques teleconferences 13 August 2003 Michael Cooper

Wednesday, 20 August 2003

• Regrets, Techniques teleconference 20 August 2003 Roberto Ellero

Thursday, 21 August 2003

• log from 21 august telecon Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: [320] Ability to be expressed in words Joe Clark

Tuesday, 19 August 2003

• Re: Conformance Claims - proposal Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG

Wednesday, 20 August 2003

• The Disunity of W3C Specs Geoff Deering
• Re: Conformance Claims - proposal Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• [techs] pronunciation of emoticons and symbols Wendy A Chisholm

Tuesday, 19 August 2003

• [320] Ability to be expressed in words Gregg Vanderheiden
• [330] Acronyms and abbreviations Gregg Vanderheiden
• [techs] EXTENDED Techniques teleconference 20 August 2003 Michael Cooper
• Re: Conformance Claims Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: Hiding email addresses in an accessible way Gregg Vanderheiden

Monday, 18 August 2003

• Re: Hiding email addresses in an accessible way Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Hiding email addresses in an accessible way David Dorward
• Re: Hiding email addresses in an accessible way Joe Clark
• Conformance Claims Doyle Burnett
• RE: Table Techniques - Summary Lee Roberts
• Re: Table Techniques - Summary Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Fw: [eeurope-pwd] New possibility for discussion STANDARDISATION issues Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: Table Techniques - Summary John M Slatin
• RE: Table Techniques - Summary Michael Cooper

Sunday, 17 August 2003

• Re: Jaws Version 5.0 beta (long) Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG

Saturday, 16 August 2003

• Fw: ContextHelp vs. Title... Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG

Friday, 15 August 2003

• RE: Table Techniques - Summary Lee Roberts
• Re: Table Techniques - Summary Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Re: Table Techniques - Summary Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: Table Techniques - Summary Ben Caldwell
• RE: Table Techniques - Summary Lee Roberts
• Re: ContextHelp vs. Title... Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: ContextHelp vs. Title... Lee Roberts
• Re: Table Techniques - Summary Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: Table Techniques - Summary Lee Roberts
• Re: Table Techniques - Summary Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: Table Techniques - Summary John M Slatin
• Re: ContextHelp vs. Title... Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: ContextHelp vs. Title... John M Slatin
• ContextHelp vs. Title... Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Jaws Version 5.0 beta (long) Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Apologies for Being Off WAIGL for Some Time Geoff Deering

Thursday, 14 August 2003

• Regrets, teleconference 14 August Francesco Fedele
• Providing a glossary link Y.P. Hoitink
• Re: Table Techniques - Summary Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: Techniques revision - Meaningful link names John M Slatin
• RE: Table Techniques - Summary John M Slatin
• Re: Table Techniques - Header Markup Layout Tables Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Table Techniques - Header Markup Layout Tables Chris Ridpath
• Regrets, teleconference 14 August Alistair Garrison
• RE: Web Accessibility: New LIFT NN/g product with product review John M Slatin
• Regrets, teleconference 14 August Matthew Margolin
• Regrets, teleconference 14 August Roberto Ellero
• Re: [techs] Summary of Techniques teleconferences 13 August 2003 Joe Clark

Wednesday, 13 August 2003

• 8 and 9 September Techniques Task Force meeting Wendy A Chisholm
• Results of informal survey of link usage Michael Cooper
• Re: Kynn's Review of WCAG 2.0 Draft (24 June 2003) Wendy A Chisholm
• [techs] Summary of Techniques teleconferences 13 August 2003 Michael Cooper
• Re: Kynn's Review of WCAG 2.0 Draft (24 June 2003) Wendy A Chisholm
• IRC log from today's techniques task force telecon Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: Usage of links in HTML Donna
• RE: [techs] EXTENDED Techniques teleconference 13 August 2003 Michael Cooper
• Regrets for tech meetings 13 + 20 August Y.P. Hoitink
• Re: [techs] EXTENDED Techniques teleconference 13 August 2003 Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Re: [techs] EXTENDED Techniques teleconference 13 August 2003 Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• FW: Web Accessibility: New LIFT NN/g product with product review Gregg Vanderheiden
• Research Query Kathryn Clancy
• Agenda Gregg Vanderheiden

Tuesday, 12 August 2003

• Re: proposal 3: checkpoint 3.3 Matt May
• RE: proposal 3: checkpoint 3.3 Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Call for Review: Working Draft of Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: [techs] EXTENDED Techniques teleconference 13 August 2003 Wendy A Chisholm
• [techs] EXTENDED Techniques teleconference 13 August 2003 Michael Cooper
• RE: proposal 3: checkpoint 3.3 lisa seeman
• RE: proposal 3: checkpoint 3.3 Chris Brainerd
• W3C Weekly News - 12 August 2003 by way of Wendy A Chisholm

Monday, 11 August 2003

• Re: proposal 3: checkpoint 3.3 Matt May
• Feedback from QAWG re: implementation testing Wendy A Chisholm
• [techs] html-techs draft Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: Re: Links from Yvette Eric Velleman

Sunday, 10 August 2003

• Re: Links from Yvette Ineke van der Maat
• RE: Links from Yvette Y.P. Hoitink
• Re: Links from Yvette Ineke van der Maat
• RE: [lexical (+ contextual) clarification] Re: proposal 3: checkpoint 3.3 lisa seeman

Saturday, 9 August 2003

• RE: [lexical (+ contextual) clarification] Re: proposal 3: checkpoint 3.3 Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: [lexical (+ contextual) clarification] Re: proposal 3: checkpoint 3.3 Jason White
• RE: [lexical (+ contextual) clarification] Re: proposal 3: checkpoint 3.3 Charles McCathieNevile
• Ultimate tersification, please! William Loughborough

Friday, 8 August 2003

• Usage of links in HTML Michael Cooper
• [techs] Summary of Techniques teleconferences 06 August 2003 Michael Cooper
• Re: Table Techniques - Summary Matt May
• WCAG 2.0 Draft Comments Harvey Bingham
• RE: Table Techniques - Summary Ben Caldwell
• Re: Table Techniques - Summary Jens Meiert
• Re: Links from Yvette Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Re: IRC log from 7 August 2003 telecon Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Late Regrets Chris Brainerd
• RE: Techniques revision - Meaningful link names Chris Brainerd

Thursday, 7 August 2003

• IRC log from 7 August 2003 telecon Wendy A Chisholm
• regrets Lee Roberts
• Re: Table Techniques - Summary Matt May
• Re: Table Techniques - Summary Chris Ridpath
• Re: Techniques revision - Meaningful link names Joe Clark
• RE: Techniques revision - Meaningful link names David MacDonald
• Re: Table Techniques - Summary Joe Clark
• Re: Links from Yvette Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: Links from Yvette Y.P. Hoitink
• Re: Techniques revision - Meaningful link names Jens Meiert

Wednesday, 6 August 2003

• Re: Techniques revision - Meaningful link names Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Techniques revision - Meaningful link names Al Gilman
• Re: Links from Yvette Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Table Techniques - Summary Chris Ridpath
• RE: Links from Yvette Y.P. Hoitink
• Techniques revision - Meaningful link names David MacDonald
• Regrets for 8/21 and 8/28 Cynthia Shelly
• Links from Yvette Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• LINK text Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Table Techniques - Caption Chris Ridpath
• regrets for this week and next Gian Sampson-Wild
• Re: Agenda - REGRETS (no message) Doyle
• RE: [lexical (+ contextual) clarification] Re: proposal 3: checkpoint 3.3 lisa seeman
• Agenda Jason White
• RE: [lexical (+ contextual) clarification] Re: proposal 3: checkpoint 3.3 Y.P. Hoitink
• RE: [lexical (+ contextual) clarification] Re: proposal 3: checkpoint 3.3 Y.P. Hoitink
• RE: [lexical (+ contextual) clarification] Re: proposal 3: checkpoint 3.3 lisa seeman
• regrets for the next 3 weeks Loretta Guarino Reid

Tuesday, 5 August 2003

• Dialpad: top pc-2-phone tool Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• [techs] EXTENDED Techniques teleconference 23 July 2003 Michael Cooper
• RE: [lexical (+ contextual) clarification] Re: proposal 3: checkpoint 3.3 lisa seeman
• Transform 2004: Assistive Technology and Inclusion: 10th July UMIST Manchester UK Jonathan Chetwynd
• W3C Weekly News - 5 August 2003 by way of Wendy A Chisholm

Monday, 4 August 2003

• [lexical (+ contextual) clarification] Re: proposal 3: checkpoint 3.3 Al Gilman

Sunday, 3 August 2003

• proposal 1: 4.2 lisa seeman
• proposal 2 : 4.1 lisa seeman
• proposal 3: checkpoint 3.3 lisa seeman
• Kynn's Review of WCAG 2.0 Draft (24 June 2003) Kynn Bartlett
• WCAG 2.0 Call comments on Slashdot Jonathan Chetwynd

Saturday, 2 August 2003

• Re: Techniques Task Force F2F week of 8 Sept David MacDonald

Friday, 1 August 2003

• REGRETS Beyond Late Doyle

Thursday, 31 July 2003

• sorry, late regrets (no message) Francesco Fedele
• Techniques Task Force F2F week of 8 Sept Wendy A Chisholm
• DRAFT WCAG 2.0 Implementation Testing Framework Wendy A Chisholm
• late regrets Jabari Simmons
• regrets Lee Roberts
• sorry, late regrets (no msg) Avi Arditti
• Regrets for Roberto Castaldo Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG

Wednesday, 30 July 2003

• Dr. Graham Harding to visit WCAG Working Group Gregg Vanderheiden
• [techs] IRC log of 30 July techs task force telecon Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: [techs] Techniques teleconference 30 July 2003 Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: [techs] Techniques teleconference 30 July 2003 Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Re: Checkpoint 2.3 Avoid causing the screen to flicker. Chris Brainerd
• Agenda Jason White

Tuesday, 29 July 2003

• REORG proposal #2 from Cynthia Gregg Vanderheiden
• Draft of Gateway Techniques Loretta Guarino
• Re: [techs] 23 July IRC log, 20 action items Wendy A Chisholm
• [techs] Techniques teleconference 30 July 2003 Michael Cooper
• Re: [techs] new HTML Techniques draft, minor edits Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: [techs] new HTML Techniques draft, minor edits Lee Roberts
• [techs] new HTML Techniques draft, minor edits Wendy A Chisholm

Monday, 28 July 2003

• W3C Weekly News - 29 July 2003 by way of Wendy A Chisholm
• IRC log from 24 July 2003 WCAG telecon Wendy A Chisholm
• [techs] 23 July IRC log, 20 action items Wendy A Chisholm

Thursday, 24 July 2003

• regrets Lee Roberts
• RE: REF 3.1 TAKE 2 - Add specificity to required checkpoint. Andi Snow-Weaver
• RE: REF 1.6 - New Success Criteria Andi Snow-Weaver
• Re: Tomorrow's agenda Kerstin Goldsmith
• RE: REF 1.6 - New Success Criteria Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: REF 2.2 - Two new best practice items for 2.2 Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Tomorrow's agenda Cynthia Shelly
• Late regrets Roberto Ellero
• Re: REF 2.2 - Two new best practice items for 2.2 Andi Snow-Weaver
• Re: REF 2.3 - Delete item 3 from 2.3 Andi Snow-Weaver
• Re: REF 1.6 - New Success Criteria Andi Snow-Weaver
• Re: Tomorrow's agenda Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Re: Tomorrow's agenda - REGRETS Doyle
• Tomorrow's agenda Jason White

Wednesday, 23 July 2003

• regrets for tomorrow and next week gian.sampsonwild@families.qld.gov.au
• REGRETS for Tomorrow - July 23, 2003 Doyle
• Techniques doc 2.0 edits to some text David MacDonald
• Regrets for a while Charles McCathieNevile
• Title Checks Chris Ridpath
• Re: Table Techniques Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Table Techniques Lee Roberts
• Table Techniques Chris Ridpath
• Subjects that don't convey meaning Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: [techs] EXTENDED Techniques teleconference 23 July 2003 Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: refresh lisa seeman
• Re: Gateway Techniques Loretta Guarino Reid

Tuesday, 22 July 2003

• Re: Outlet for Authors to override guidelines Kynn Bartlett

Wednesday, 23 July 2003

• RE: Gateway Techniques Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: refresh Chris Brainerd
• RE: Gateway Techniques Chris Brainerd

Tuesday, 22 July 2003

• Gateway Techniques Loretta Guarino Reid
• Re: [#293] Summary for tables Chris Ridpath
• Re: [#293] Summary for tables Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: refresh Jens Meiert
• Re: Outlet for Authors to override guidelines Jens Meiert
• RE: [html-techs] New HTML Techniques for WCAG 2.0 *rough* draft Jens Meiert

Monday, 21 July 2003

• RE: refresh Chris Brainerd
• RE: [#293] Summary for tables Chris Brainerd
• Outlet for Authors to override guidelines Chris Brainerd
• RE: REF 2.4b - a second required success criteria Chris Brainerd
• RE: [#293] Summary for tables Chris Brainerd
• RE: [html-techs] New HTML Techniques for WCAG 2.0 *rough* draft Chris Brainerd
• [techs] EXTENDED Techniques teleconference 23 July 2003 Michael Cooper
• RE: Review Draft: "Additional notes" John M Slatin
• Re: refresh Jens Meiert
• refresh lisa seeman

Saturday, 19 July 2003

• Re: Review Draft: "Additional notes" Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: Review Draft: "Additional notes" Gregg Vanderheiden

Thursday, 17 July 2003

• Content is no more complex than necessary John M Slatin
• RE: refresh Al Gilman
• Re: [#293] Summary for tables Chris Ridpath
• Review Draft: "Additional notes" John M Slatin
• RE: [#293] Summary for tables Gregg Vanderheiden
• Regrets for 24 and 31 July and 7 August John M Slatin
• Checkpoint 2.1 [Core], Success criterion 1 John M Slatin
• RE: [#293] Summary for tables Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Regrets Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Re: Regrets Matthew Margolin
• Regrets Michael Cooper
• RE: Agenda for 7/18/2003 Paul Bohman
• Re: [#293] Summary for tables Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: REF 2.4b - a second required success criteria Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: [#293] Summary for tables Chris Ridpath
• RE: REF 2.4b - a second required success criteria Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Regrets for this week Lee Roberts
• RE: [techs] Summary/Minutes of July 16 Techniques Call John M Slatin
• RE: [techs] Summary/Minutes of July 16 Techniques Call John M Slatin
• Re: [#293] Summary for tables Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: [#293] Summary for tables Chris Ridpath
• [techs] Summary/Minutes of July 16 Techniques Call Ben Caldwell
• Re: [#293] Summary for tables Roberto Ellero
• Regrets for this week Avi Arditti
• Re: [#293] Summary for tables Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: [#293] Summary for tables Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: [#293] Summary for tables Chris Ridpath
• Re: [#293] Summary for tables Chris Ridpath
• Re: [#293] Summary for tables Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: techniques (html): action items for Chris Ridpath
• Re: [#293] Summary for tables Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Re: [#293] Summary for tables Chris Ridpath
• Re: [#293] Summary for tables Chris Ridpath
• RE: refresh Little, James
• RE: refresh Jens Meiert
• Re: refresh Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: refresh Little, James
• Re: refresh Jens Meiert
• Re: [#293] Summary for tables Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: [#293] Summary for tables lisa seeman
• refresh lisa seeman
• techniques (html): action items for lisa seeman
• regrets for this week; request for scribe Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: [#293] Summary for tables Jens Meiert

Wednesday, 16 July 2003

• Re: Agenda for 7/18/2003 gian.sampsonwild@families.qld.gov.au
• RE: "Header information" RE: REF 3.2 Change "unambiguously" to "first listing". Gregg Vanderheiden
• Review Draft Ben Caldwell
• Agenda for 7/18/2003 Gregg Vanderheiden..
• RE: [#293] Summary for tables Chris Ridpath

Tuesday, 15 July 2003

• Re: FW: conformance attached Francesco Fedele
• the 3-column float shuffle Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: [techs] Techniques teleconference 16 July 2003 Charles McCathieNevile
• [techs] Techniques teleconference 16 July 2003 Michael Cooper
• RE: REF 1.1a - Add definition to 1.1 for ability to be expressed in words John M Slatin
• Re: REF 1.1a - Add definition to 1.1 for ability to be expressed in words Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: REF 1.1a - Add definition to 1.1 for ability to be expressed in words Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: REF 3.2 Change "unambiguously" to "first listing". Al Gilman

Monday, 14 July 2003

• "Header information" RE: REF 3.2 Change "unambiguously" to "first listing". Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: REF 1.1a - Add definition to 1.1 for ability to be expressed in words Ben Caldwell
• Re: REF 1.1a - Add definition to 1.1 for ability to be expressed in words Jonathan Chetwynd
• RE: REF 3.2 Change "unambiguously" to "first listing". Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: WCAG 2.0 Checkpoint "Handles" or Short Names Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: [html-techs] New HTML Techniques for WCAG 2.0 *rough* draft John M Slatin
• RE: WCAG 2.0 Checkpoint "Handles" or Short Names Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: [html-techs] New HTML Techniques for WCAG 2.0 *rough* draft Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: REF 2.4b - a second required success criteria John M Slatin
• RE: [html-techs] New HTML Techniques for WCAG 2.0 *rough* draft Richard Ishida
• Re: WCAG 2.0 Checkpoint "Handles" or Short Names Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: WCAG 2.0 Checkpoint "Handles" or Short Names John M Slatin
• RE: REF 1.1a - Add definition to 1.1 for ability to be expressed in words Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: WCAG 2.0 Checkpoint "Handles" or Short Names Giorgio Brajnik
• Re: REF 1.1a - Add definition to 1.1 for ability to be expressed in words Jonathan Chetwynd
• WCAG2: 3 - Bottom layer - Technology-specific application information Jonathan Chetwynd

Sunday, 13 July 2003

• RE: REF 1.1a - Add definition to 1.1 for ability to be expressed in words Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: [html-techs] New HTML Techniques for WCAG 2.0 *rough* draft Lee Roberts
• Re: REF: 4.1 Move deprecated features Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: REF 1.1a - Add definition to 1.1 for ability to be expressed in words maurizio@usabile.it
• Re: WCAG 2.0 Checkpoint "Handles" or Short Names Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: WCAG 2.0 Checkpoint "Handles" or Short Names Giorgio Brajnik
• RE: REF 1.1a - Add definition to 1.1 for ability to be expressed in words Giorgio Brajnik
• Re: REF 3.2 Change "unambiguously" to "first listing". Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: REF 3.1 TAKE 2 - Add specificity to required checkpoint. Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: REF 2.4b - a second required success criteria Giorgio Brajnik

Saturday, 12 July 2003

• Re: [html-techs] New HTML Techniques for WCAG 2.0 *rough* draft Carlos A Velasco
• Re: [html-techs] New HTML Techniques for WCAG 2.0 *rough* draft Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Re: [html-techs] New HTML Techniques for WCAG 2.0 *rough* draft Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• re: [html-techs] New HTML Techniques for WCAG 2.0 *rough* draft Wendy A Chisholm
• [html-techs] New HTML Techniques for WCAG 2.0 *rough* draft Wendy A Chisholm
• Re: REF 1.1b - Checkpoint 1.1 - Requirement for full text script of all movies Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: REF 1.1a - Add definition to 1.1 for ability to be expressed in words Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: [166] Organize documents so they may be read without style sheets Charles McCathieNevile

Friday, 11 July 2003

• RE: REF 1.1a - Add definition to 1.1 for ability to be expressed in words John M Slatin
• RE: [166] Organize documents so they may be read without style sheets Joe Clark
• Re: REF 1.1b - Checkpoint 1.1 - Requirement for full text script of all movies Joe Clark
• Re: REF 1.1a - Add definition to 1.1 for ability to be expressed in words Joe Clark
• RE[2]: REF 1.1a - Add definition to 1.1 for ability to be expressed in words Al Gilman
• RE: REF 1.1a - Add definition to 1.1 for ability to be expressed in words Paul Bohman
• RE: REF 1.1a - Add definition to 1.1 for ability to be expressed in words Al Gilman
• RE: REF 1.1a - Add definition to 1.1 for ability to be expressed in words Montgomery, Gordon
• RE: REF 1.1a - Add definition to 1.1 for ability to be expressed in words John M Slatin
• NCD Says Web Sites need to be accessible to people with Disabilties Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: REF 1.1a - Add definition to 1.1 for ability to be expressed in words Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: REF 2.4b - a second required success criteria Gregg Vanderheiden

Thursday, 10 July 2003

• Regrets Lee Roberts
• RE: REF 1.1a - Add definition to 1.1 for ability to be expressed in words Paul Bohman
• [techs] HTML Techs Checklist Items as T/F statements Ben Caldwell
• REF 4.3 needs to be rewritten. Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: REF 2.4b - a second required success criteria John M Slatin
• RE: REF 3.1 TAKE 2 - Add specificity to required checkpoint. John M Slatin
• REF 3.2 Change "unambiguously" to "first listing". Gregg Vanderheiden
• Some more Editorial Items Gregg Vanderheiden
• REF 3.4 layout - success criteria add Gregg Vanderheiden
• REF: 4.1 Move deprecated features Gregg Vanderheiden
• Regrest for today Rudy Cavallin
• RE: Checkpoint 3.3 Editorial Suggestion Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: REF 3.1 TAKE 2 - Add specificity to required checkpoint. Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: REF 2.4b - a second required success criteria Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Checkpoint 3.3 Editorial Suggestion John M Slatin
• RE: REF 2.4b - a second required success criteria John M Slatin
• RE: REF 3.1 TAKE 2 - Add specificity to required checkpoint. Gregg Vanderheiden

Wednesday, 9 July 2003

• RE: REF 3.1 TAKE 2 - Add specificity to required checkpoint. John M Slatin
• RE: REF 1.6 - New Success Criteria John M Slatin
• RE: REF 2.4b - a second required success criteria John M Slatin
• RE: REF 1.1a - Add definition to 1.1 for ability to be expressed in words John M Slatin
• RE: REF 2.4b - a second required success criteria Ben Caldwell
• Re: REF 3.1 TAKE 2 - Add specificity to required checkpoint. Kerstin Goldsmith
• Action item: Accessibility and conformance section Matt May
• Checkpoint 3.3 Editorial Suggestion Ben Caldwell
• REF 3.1 TAKE 2 - Add specificity to required checkpoint. Gregg Vanderheiden
• REF 2.2 - Two new best practice items for 2.2 Gregg Vanderheiden
• REF 2.3 - Delete item 3 from 2.3 Gregg Vanderheiden
• REF 1.5a - Making 1.5 item #1 under Best practice (or Level 2) more definite Gregg Vanderheiden
• REF 1.5b - Need for consistency in best practice phrasing across checkpoints Gregg Vanderheiden
• REF 1.6 - New Success Criteria Gregg Vanderheiden
• REF ALL of them - Need for explicit rationale for placement of each item in required, Level 2, or best practice Gregg Vanderheiden
• REF Editorial Suggestions for Guidelines. Gregg Vanderheiden
• REF 1.3 - Adding color to 1.3 Gregg Vanderheiden
• REF 3.1 - Add specificity to required checkpoint. Gregg Vanderheiden
• REF 1.1b - Checkpoint 1.1 - Requirement for full text script of all movies Gregg Vanderheiden
• REF 1.1a - Add definition to 1.1 for ability to be expressed in words Gregg Vanderheiden
• REF 2.4b - a second required success criteria Gregg Vanderheiden
• REF 2.4a - Add another best practice checkpoint for 2.4 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: agenda Matthew Margolin
• RE: WCAG 2.0 Checkpoint "Handles" or Short Names Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: WCAG 2.0 Checkpoint "Handles" or Short Names Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: agenda Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: [techs] Techniques teleconference 09 July 2003 Charles McCathieNevile
• agenda Jason White
• FW: conformance attached Gregg Vanderheiden

Tuesday, 8 July 2003

• Re: Notes from Face to Face: Things being looked for in 2.0 Jonathan O'Donnell
• [techs] Techniques teleconference 09 July 2003 Michael Cooper
• Re: Draft Notes on Web Accessibility from Prospective of Various Countries Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Legal not illegal docs in USA Gregg Vanderheiden
• short timeline = busy summer Gregg Vanderheiden
• Draft Notes on Web Accessibility from Prospective of Various Countries Gregg Vanderheiden
• Notes from Face to Face: Things being looked for in 2.0 Gregg Vanderheiden

Monday, 7 July 2003

• FW: English as a Second Language Gregg Vanderheiden

Thursday, 3 July 2003

• Re: regrets for tomorrow Kerstin Goldsmith
• Re: regrets for tomorrow Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Re: regrets for tomorrow Kerstin Goldsmith
• Re: regrets for tomorrow Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG

Thursday, 3 July 200

• WCAG 2.0 Checkpoint "Handles" or Short Names Katie Haritos-Shea

Thursday, 3 July 2003

• Re: accessiblepages about accessibility Jonathan Chetwynd

Wednesday, 2 July 2003

• regrets for tomorrow Kerstin Goldsmith
• Some photos from the f2f rscano@iwa-italy.org

Tuesday, 1 July 2003

• W3C Weekly News - 27 June 2003 by way of Wendy A Chisholm
• RE: Submit Event: RE: Automatic submission of forms and screen changes Jens Meiert
• RE: Submit Event: RE: Automatic submission of forms and screen changes Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Submit Event: RE: Automatic submission of forms and screen changes Charles McCathieNevile

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 September 2003 22:25:23 UTC