- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@wiscmail.wisc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 20:41:23 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
- Message-id: <006a01c344f2$0a8b94c0$056fa8c0@USD320002X>
The face to face was very interesting and helpful in getting international perspectives as well as expectations and uses of the guidelines. It also highlighted our timeline. If we are to make our schedule of having something out by a year from now, it turns out that we need to have essentially a completed set of guidelines by September. Only by having an essentially completed set in September would we be able to go through the various steps of testing, implementation, and the level of reviews and candidacy necessary to have it out by next summer. Yes, that means we will have to be busy and productive this summer. It also means that the same efficient pace we have been using lately to move forward will need to be continued. I want to thank everyone who has been participating so well and productively of late and to invite everyone else who is interested in providing input to jump in now. * Take the guidelines and give them a good read. * Grab the open issues list and see if you can propose a solution to one. * Whenever you think of a problem, try to propose a solution. It's kind of exciting to see 2.0 coming together. There is a lot of work left to do. Oh yes - and we have one very big element that was highlighted at the face to face. The guidelines themselves are very hard to interpret without the technique specific checklists. Without the checklists, WCAG 1.0 is actually much easier for people to use. The checklist will therefore have to be a high priority as we move forward. Thanks, Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison
Received on Monday, 7 July 2003 21:41:33 UTC