Re: REF 1.1a - Add definition to 1.1 for ability to be expressed in words

Gregg,

where is illustation mentioned in Guideline 3*? where are you referring 
to?

It may be that if illustration were placed within Guideline 1,
with an explanation of what makes for a good illustration in Guideline 
3,
This might more closely follow the arrangement for text.

Jonathan

*http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/




On Monday, July 14, 2003, at 09:22  am, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote:

> Hi Jonathan,
>
> Yes, there is
>
> It is under “Understandable”
>
> Guideline 1 only acts to make sure it is within perception of the user.
>
> Guideline 3 is focused on making it fall within the understanding of 
> the user.
>
>  
>
>  
> Gregg
>
>  -- ------------------------------
> Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.
> Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
> Director - Trace R & D Center
> University of Wisconsin-Madison
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On 
> Behalf OfJonathan Chetwynd
> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 2:31 AM
> To: WAI GL
> Subject: Re: REF 1.1a - Add definition to 1.1 for ability to be 
> expressed in words
>
>  
>
> Guideline 1: PERCEIVABLE. Make Content Perceivable by Any User
>
> First let me apologise for not having been a regular participant, and 
> missing Venice f2f.
>
> It does seem a concern that having tabled such a broad Guideline as 
> stated above,
> we then get embroiled immediately in the nitty gritty, it seems once 
> again that we have reverted to text equivalents, which is only one of 
> the very many possibilities that this porisma offers.
>
> Is there a provision to provide illustration for text, which is a 
> natural outcome.
>
> Jonathan
>