- From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 08:08:58 -0500
- To: "Wendy A Chisholm" <wendy@w3.org>, "Roberto Ellero" <rellero@webaccessibile.org>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I agree with Wendy's point that brightness needs to be factored in. Arie Arditi says that people with low vision often have color deficits across all three dimensions of color (brightness, hue, and saturation). John "Good design is accessible design." Please note our new name and URL! John Slatin, Ph.D. Director, Accessibility Institute University of Texas at Austin FAC 248C 1 University Station G9600 Austin, TX 78712 ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524 email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/ -----Original Message----- From: Wendy A Chisholm [mailto:wendy@w3.org] Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 7:47 pm To: Roberto Ellero; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: Re: Equation for determining color "closeness" Thanks, Roberto. >I noticed that the complementary colour (directly opposite to each >other in the colour wheel) combination has the highest contrast. >http://www.webwhirlers.com/colors/combining.asp In my experience, red and green are considered complementary [1,2,3,4]. In the resource that you cite red and green don't appear to be complementary. Another source names the complementary pairs as [6]: green and magenta, blue and amber, and blue-green and red. If red and green are complementary, there is at least one exception to the complementary rule: don't use green and red together (unless it is ok to miss the information presented in an overlap of the two colors). What about the other definitions of complementary colors? Is it ok to overlap red and blue-green? Reading Aries's pamphlet [5] it seems that red on blue-green is OK as long as you use dark red against light blue-green and don't use light red on dark blue-green. Joe's book seems to support this when he says, "Don't set green on red or red on green....unless: The items have considerable difference in brightness....If the lightness contrast is _indisputably_ high, you've solved the problem." [7] So, it seems to me that the "complements rule," while short and sweet, doesn't quite stand on its own. Brightness needs to be part of the equation. --wendy [1] http://www.sanford-artedventures.com/study/g_complementary.html [2] http://www.colormatters.com/colortheory.html [3] http://painting.about.com/library/blcompcolors.htm [4] http://www.artsconnected.org/toolkit/encyc_colorwheel.html [5] http://www.lighthouse.org/color_contrast.htm [6] http://www.gweep.net/~prefect/pubs/iqp/node69.html [7] http://joeclark.org/book/sashay/serialization/Chapter09.html -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI/ /--
Received on Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:09:41 UTC