- From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 15:04:11 -0400
- To: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Kynn, Thank you for the thorough review. I'm adding your comments to the WCAG 2.0 issues list. http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/issuereports/wcag2_issues.php I did not create issues for a couple of your comments and I need clarification on another. At 01:42 AM 8/3/2003, Kynn Bartlett wrote: > 19. Checkpoint 1.2 editorial note: This is a big headache. Ugh! No > good answer here. Did not add to issues list. > 20. Checkpoint 1.3: I don't understand the [information/substance] > phrasing. Are you asking which one is better? Yes, we are asking which one is better. Did not add this question to issues list. >18. Checkpoint 1.1 examples: Since this checkpoint is both basic and >vastly complex, some definitive examples of when and where and how to use >text equivalents should be here, not just relegated to the techniques. Are you asking for technology-specific examples? i.e., do you want to see HTML examples here? Would you be satisfied if we expanded on the 5 existing examples without including any technology-specifics? Best, --wendy -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI/ /--
Received on Wednesday, 13 August 2003 15:04:34 UTC