- From: Lee Roberts <leeroberts@roserockdesign.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 23:24:22 -0500
- To: <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>, "'Web Content Guidelines'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Regrets. I have a meeting with a law firm regarding a patent I'm working on. Lee -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jason White Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 10:41 PM To: Web Content Guidelines Subject: Agenda Thursday, 11 September, 2000 UTC (4 PM US Eastern, 10 PM France, 6 AM Eastern Australia, etc.) on +1-617-761-6200, passcode 9224, irc.w3.org 6665, channel #wai-wcag Reorganization proposals: There are currently three proposals on offer. 1. The latest Review draft of WCAG 2.0: http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2003/07/review_draft.html 2. An initial reorganization proposal, prepared in response to teleconference discussions: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2003JulSep/0226.html 3. A third proposal, due to the joint efforts of Wendy, Cynthia and Kerstin: See the documents cited at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2003JulSep/0500.html and the explanations in that message. Some questions to consider in preparation for the meeting: 1. What problems are the reorganization proposals intended to solve? 2. What are the differences of approach, priority and perception that are reflected in these proposals? Can they be reconciled? How can we clarify the trade-offs involved in each alternative? 3. Which, if any, of the proposals do you favour? Why?
Received on Thursday, 11 September 2003 00:28:15 UTC