- From: Roberto Ellero <rellero@webaccessibile.org>
- Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 09:55:07 +0200
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I found interesting this mensurability of the contrast. I noticed that the complementary colour (directly opposite to each other in the colour wheel) combination has the highest contrast. http://www.webwhirlers.com/colors/combining.asp "Split complementary is a colour and the analogous colours to its complement color. Using split complementary colours can give you a design with a high degree of contrast, yet still not as extreme as a real complementary colour. It also results in greater harmony than the use of the direct complementary." http://www.color-wheel-pro.com/color-schemes.html#split Maybe this site is useful: http://www.4colorvision.com/files/colorcontrperf.htm It's about contrast performance of the human eye. It is interesting also to notice that even the chromatic contrast sensitivity functions are subjected to a logarithm: http://www.4colorvision.com/files/colorcontrperf.htm#equations Best regards, Roberto Ellero ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wendy A Chisholm" <wendy@w3.org> To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 12:38 AM Subject: Equation for determining color "closeness" > > On page 93 in Chapter 4 (Creating Accessible Content) of "Constructing > Accessible Web Sites" [1], Jim Thatcher writes, "It is clear that good > contrast occurs when two colors are close to complementary. 'Closeness' can > be calculated as if the R G B colors are points in the three-dimensional space: > Distance = ( (R1-R2) ^2 + (G1-G2) ^2 + (B1-B2) ^2) ^1/2 > " > > [1] http://www.jimthatcher.com/book.htm > > -- > wendy a chisholm > world wide web consortium > web accessibility initiative > http://www.w3.org/WAI/ > /-- > >
Received on Saturday, 30 August 2003 03:59:44 UTC