- From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 14:50:22 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 17 July 2003 15:50:23 UTC
The first required success criterion for Checkpoint 2.1 reads as follows: 1. all of the functionality of the content, where the functionality or its outcome can be expressed concisely in words, is operable at a minimum through a keyboard or keyboard interface. I do not understand the rationale for the limitation "where the functionality or its outcome can be expresed concisely in words..." What functionality or outcomes does this language exempt from the requirement? This concern is related to concern over the concern about "non-text content that can be expressed in words" that we've discussed in regard to Checkpoint 1.1. John John Slatin, Ph.D. Director, Institute for Technology & Learning University of Texas at Austin FAC 248C 1 University Station G9600 Austin, TX 78712 ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524 email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu web http://www.ital.utexas.edu <http://www.ital.utexas.edu/>
Received on Thursday, 17 July 2003 15:50:23 UTC