Re: Review Draft: "Additional notes"

• From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
• Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 17:13:59 +0200
• To: <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, "'John M Slatin'" <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <001701c34e08$62a60c20$0100a8c0@rscano>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
To: "'John M Slatin'" <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>; <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 4:52 PM
Subject: RE: Review Draft: "Additional notes"


> John wrote
> 
> Would it make sense to rename the new "Additional Notes" "Additional
> Recommendations"?
> 

IMHO no, because all the document will be a Reccomandation.

Received on Saturday, 19 July 2003 11:14:11 UTC