- From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 09:31:50 -0500
- To: "Ben Caldwell" <caldwell@trace.wisc.edu>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Another editorial suggestion: delete the phrase "is written to be" Current wording: "Content is written to be no more complex than necessary ... " Proposed wording: "Content is no more complex than necessary ..." Rationale: proposed wording comes a little closer to meeting its own standard. John John Slatin, Ph.D. Director, Institute for Technology & Learning University of Texas at Austin FAC 248C 1 University Station G9600 Austin, TX 78712 ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524 email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu web http://www.ital.utexas.edu -----Original Message----- From: Ben Caldwell [mailto:caldwell@trace.wisc.edu] Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 6:20 pm To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: Checkpoint 3.3 Editorial Suggestion The text of checkpoint 3.3 seems to have some grammatical issues... It currently reads: Checkpoint: 3.3 [EXTENDED] Content is written to be no more complex than is necessary and/or supplement with simpler forms of the content. Should be reworded to include "is supplemented" as follows: Checkpoint: 3.3 [EXTENDED] Content is written to be no more complex than is necessary and/or is supplemented with simpler forms of the content. -- Ben Caldwell | caldwell@trace.wisc.edu Trace Research and Development Center (http://trace.wisc.edu)
Received on Thursday, 10 July 2003 10:31:51 UTC