- From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 11:08:52 -0400
- To: WAI-GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Nope, this document does not validate. It was published to show a prototype for an idea. The XML needs to be cleaned up and the document needs to be republished. --w At 08:24 PM 8/28/2003, Joe Clark wrote: > > I tested the links or one link from today's Techniques Audio Conference > > ([15]http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-WCAG20-GATEWAY-20030723.html) > >and I don't know what that's all about, but it is not valid HTML. > ><http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-WCAG20-GATEWAY-20030723.html> > >One of those eat-your-own-vegan-dogfood things. > >The CSS validates, though, if you can dig around to find the right URL. > ><http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/base/techniques.css> > > > I recall some months back, we discussed the importance of assuring that web > > accessibility cross the operating system divide and we needed to look > at how > > things render on Macs. > >1. Write valid code >2. Tweak for known incompatibilities in target browsers > >Action 2 above includes Macs and various other platforms, of course. > >For both 1 and 2, read _Designing with Web Standards_ by Zeldman, among >many other widely-available sources. > >A *lot* of people working in Web accessibility use Macintosh or are >outright Macintosh separatists. I do not think WAI is in much of a >position to use its own invalid documents as models of CSS-based design, >however. > >-- > > Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org > Author, _Building Accessible Websites_ > <http://joeclark.org/access/> | <http://joeclark.org/book/> -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI/ /--
Received on Friday, 29 August 2003 11:09:00 UTC