- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 10:27:13 -0400
- To: jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.au, wendy@w3.org
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
2nd try Jason White (Chair - WCAG WG), Wendy Chisholm (Staff - WCAG WG) we have identified that the WCAG WG might be an excellent candidate for a partial or total implementation of QA Operational Guidelines[1] (QA Ops GL). (CR version of the document will be published soon in one week or two. The preliminary version is available at http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2003/09/qaframe-ops-20030905) One of the criteria of success of the CR phase will be to gather the experience (preferably successful) on implementations of the QA Operational Guidelines. By applying, we don't mean to say "comply" but only going thru the Ops checklist and report to the QAWG what they think they're already doing, what they expect to do in the future (and by when), and what they don't expect to do (with rationales). It will not be necessary to implement everything (but better if all) but do what you can or what you think is valuable. We would like by the end of the announced CR period, the 4th Technical Plenary in March 2004, to have at least 5 WGs having done this work and give us their feedback with their rationales. The phase will be to - give you the guidelines with a start kit. - do not necessary help you apply the guidelines - gather your comments and the results of your auto-evaluation (2/3 months later) - work together to modify the guidelines and/or either to help you implement them. Would you like to participate in this work? [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-ops/ -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Wednesday, 17 September 2003 10:29:16 UTC