- From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 15:48:09 -0500
- To: "Wendy A Chisholm" <wendy@w3.org>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
OK with me. "Good design is accessible design." Please note our new name and URL! John Slatin, Ph.D. Director, Accessibility Institute University of Texas at Austin FAC 248C 1 University Station G9600 Austin, TX 78712 ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524 email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/ -----Original Message----- From: Wendy A Chisholm [mailto:wendy@w3.org] Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 3:35 pm To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: Scope of WCAG 2.0 (was: Re: Minor edits to the draft charter) To address Roberto's comment, does anyone disagree with replacing the scope of WCAG 2.0 [1] with: "These guidelines cover a wide range of issues and recommendations for making Web content more accessible. They include recommendations to make pages accessible and usable by people with a full range of disabilities. In some cases something that makes Web content more 'usable' by one person makes it 'accessible' to another. The guidelines do not attempt to address all usability recommendations, but instead focus on those aspects of usability that increase accessibility." --wendy [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#scope At 03:03 AM 8/23/2003, you wrote: >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Wendy A Chisholm" <wendy@w3.org> >To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> >Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 8:12 PM >Subject: Minor edits to the draft charter > > > >4. Scope: item #1 under scope now reads: > > "Advance WCAG 2.0 further towards a W3C Recommendation, per > >requirements ...." > >Hi, >we have received from Michele Diodati (www.diodati.org) an italian >expert of accessibility that has done some translations of W3C rec., >the following question: > >http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#scope > >"These guidelines cover a wide range of issues and recommendations for >making Web content more accessible. They include recommendations to >make pages accessible and usable by people with a full range of >disabilities. In general, the guidelines do not include standard >usability recommendations except where they have specific ramifications >for accessibility beyond standard usability impacts." > >For a non-english speaking (and I think also for english ones) is not >clear what means "In general, the guidelines do not include standard >usability recommendations except where they have specific ramifications >for accessibility beyond standard usability impacts." and must be >explained in more "plain language". > >If the "scope" is not clear, is it not a good thing :) -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI/ /--
Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2003 16:48:42 UTC