- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 00:12:35 -0500
- To: "'Loretta Guarino Reid'" <lguarino@adobe.com>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
How does this relate to the checklists? Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Loretta Guarino Reid Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 3:22 PM To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: Gateway Techniques Wendy and I were looking at the general/technology-independent techniques, to put them into order so we can start working on them. In WCAG 1, there are two documents, Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0, and Core Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. The first document lists the different checkpoints and includes links to the relevant sections of technology-specific techniques. The second document contains technology-independent techniques for accessibility. For WCAG2, I'd like to propose that we combine these two documents into a single document, Gateway Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0. This would list the checkpoint from WCAG 2.0, it would include technology-independent discussions and definitions for the checkpoints, and it would include links to the technology-specific techniques for each checkpoint. For instance, this would be the place to explain what makes a good alternate description, or the color contrast issues in foreground and background colors, or the extensive advice that Lisa and Avi assembled on writing style. I'm working on a rough draft based on the WCAG 1 documents, so that we can all take a look at it and see whether this seems like a good organization. Reactions? Thoughts? Loretta
Received on Wednesday, 23 July 2003 01:14:10 UTC