RE: REF 1.6 - New Success Criteria

Not sure I understand.  Why would it not be required.  This is an extended
checkpoint so it is already not required.

And did  you mean best practice checkpoint?

 
Gregg

 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 


-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Andi Snow-Weaver
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 10:59 AM
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Cc: gv@wiscmail.wisc.edu
Subject: Re: REF 1.6 - New Success Criteria






Gregg,

Shouldn't this be covered under Best Practices for checkpoint 1.6?

   Foreground content is easily differentiable from background for both
   auditory and visual default presentations.

Andi
andisnow@us.ibm.com
IBM Accessibility Center
(512) 838-9903, http://www.ibm.com/able
Internal Tie Line 678-9903, http://w3.austin.ibm.com/~snsinfo

Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 14:56:24 -0500
From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@wiscmail.wisc.edu>
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Message-id: <004901c34654$2ecc6450$c517a8c0@USD320002X>
Subject: REF 1.6 - New Success Criteria



New Checkpoint



Second Required Success Criteria for 1.6



We don't anywhere talk about a checkpoint regarding background color.  I
think that we need to have one and I think it should be required.



Suggest the following.



Text that is presented at checkpoint 2 - text that is presented over a
background color or gray scale has a mechanism that allows the text to be
presented in a fashion that there is a greater than ______ contrast between
text and background color as measured by ______.



(Yes, this will need to be filled in or deleted prior to shipping.)

Received on Thursday, 24 July 2003 13:54:05 UTC