(double) regrets for Oct. 4
2005-09-27 minutes
Oh, and...
WSDL happiness
Protocol Schema Changes
Regrets for DAWG Oct4 telcon, at risk for Oct11
twinql Retrospective motivates DESCRIBE refinement?
Regrests for todays telecon
Update and issues: ACTION: LeeF to draft WSDL 1.1 for SPARQL thingy with AndyS and Elias
Oedipus test case (OWL-DL semantics)
Yet Another Point of Entailment/Virtual Graph point of clarification
Approving more tests?
SyntaxDev tests
agenda: RDF Data Access 27 Sep
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 27 Sep
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 27 Sep
- plaintext agenda: RDF Data Access 27 Sep
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 27 Sep
ACTION: EricP to extend < and relational ops to string, get review by Andy
[Fwd: inconsistent use of terminology in SPARQL query language document]
redefining a namespace prefix and Base IRI definition
apologies, regrets, having been taken to task.
thoughts from Tuesday telecon
- Re: thoughts from Tuesday telecon
- Re: thoughts from Tuesday telecon
- question as to use cases for the "huddle" use of bnode identifiers
- Re: thoughts from Tuesday telecon
- The Entailment bit (was Re: thoughts from Tuesday telecon)
- Re: The Entailment bit (was Re: thoughts from Tuesday telecon)
- Re: The Entailment bit (was Re: thoughts from Tuesday telecon)
- Re: The Entailment bit (was Re: thoughts from Tuesday telecon)
- Re: The Entailment bit (was Re: thoughts from Tuesday telecon)
- Protocol specification of entailment level (was Re: The Entailment bit (was Re: thoughts from Tuesday telecon))
- Re: Protocol specification of entailment level (was Re: The Entailment bit (was Re: thoughts from Tuesday telecon))
- Re: Protocol specification of entailment level (was Re: The Entailment bit (was Re: thoughts from Tuesday telecon))
- Re: Protocol specification of entailment level (was Re: The Entailment bit (was Re: thoughts from Tuesday telecon))
- Re: Protocol specification of entailment level (was Re: The Entailment bit (was Re: thoughts from Tuesday telecon))
- Re: Protocol specification of entailment level (was Re: The Entailment bit (was Re: thoughts from Tuesday telecon))
- Re: Protocol specification of entailment level (was Re: The Entailment bit (was Re: thoughts from Tuesday telecon))
- Re: Protocol specification of entailment level (was Re: The Entailment bit (was Re: thoughts from Tuesday telecon))
- Protocol specification of entailment level (was Re: The Entailment bit (was Re: thoughts from Tuesday telecon))
- Re: Protocol specification of entailment level (was Re: The Entailment bit (was Re: thoughts from Tuesday telecon))
- Re: Protocol specification of entailment level (was Re: The Entailment bit (was Re: thoughts from Tuesday telecon))
- Re: The Entailment bit (was Re: thoughts from Tuesday telecon)
- Re: The Entailment bit (was Re: thoughts from Tuesday telecon)
SyntaxDev grammar tests review
SPARQL Protocol Review and Comments
Re: [Fwd: Comments on SPARQL] (entailment, soundness, completeness)
- Re: [Fwd: Comments on SPARQL] (entailment, soundness, completeness)
On the semantics of optional
Adoption of entailment in SPARQL
Type errors with xsd:boolean arguments
regrets for dawg telcon 2005-09-20
agenda: RDF Data Access WG meeting on rdfSemantics, owlDisjunction 20 Sep
Minutes of RDF Data Access WG 2005-09-13
Namespace for sparql-protocol-types?
Call for Exclusions: SPARQL Protocol for RDF
SPARQL Protocol 20050914 published
IRI references rewording
issue#rdfSemantics : use cases
regrets
tech plenary logistics: Mon/Tue or Thu/Fri?
Agenda: RDF Data Access WG 13 Sep
- Re: Agenda: RDF Data Access WG 13 Sep
- Re: Agenda: RDF Data Access WG 13 Sep
- Re: Agenda: RDF Data Access WG 13 Sep
- Re: Agenda: RDF Data Access WG 13 Sep
DAWG scribe 13Sep?
1.71 editor's draft ready for LC pub
Fwd: Comments on last-call SPARQL draft 20050721, section 2
[Fwd: RE: Example Errors (sections 8, 9, 10)]
considering new issues: rdfSemantics, owlIntegration, owlDisjunction
- #swig discussion Re: considering new issues: rdfSemantics, owlIntegration, owlDisjunction
- Re: considering new issues: rdfSemantics, owlIntegration, owlDisjunction
- Re: considering new issues: rdfSemantics, owlIntegration, owlDisjunction
Comments on SPARQL
(Struggling for) Clarification about RDF Graph
boolean operators and type errors
[Fwd: Some typos in WD]
SPARQL schedule: good news
09/06/05 Minutes
Re: Roman Numeral test Was: Bug: "A value disjunction that encounters a type error on only one branch will return the result of evaluating the other branch."
11.2.2 EBV and type errors
updated http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/
agenda: RDF Data Access 6 Sep
Applogies for telecon of 2005-09-06
implementation expectation/experience in euler
Comments on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF"
- Re: Comments on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF"
- Re: Comments on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF"
- Re: Comments on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF"
- Re: Comments on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF"
- Re: Comments on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF"
- Re: subgraph/entailment
- Re: subgraph/entailment
- Re: subgraph/entailment
- Re: subgraph/entailment
- Re: subgraph/entailment
- Re: subgraph/entailment
- Re: subgraph/entailment
- Re: subgraph/entailment
- Re: subgraph/entailment
- Re: subgraph/entailment
- Re: subgraph/entailment
- Re: subgraph/entailment
- Re: Comments on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF"
- Re: subgraph/entailment
- Re: subgraph/entailment
- Re: subgraph/entailment
- Re: subgraph/entailment
- Re: subgraph/entailment
- Re: subgraph/entailment
- Re: subgraph/entailment
- Re: subgraph/entailment
- Re: subgraph/entailment
- Re: subgraph/entailment
- Re: subgraph/entailment
- Re: subgraph/entailment
- Re: subgraph/entailment
- Re: subgraph/entailment
- Re: subgraph/entailment
- Re: subgraph/entailment
- Re: subgraph/entailment
- Re: subgraph/entailment (rdfSemantics)
- Re: subgraph/entailment (rdfSemantics)
- Re: subgraph/entailment
- Re: subgraph/entailment
- Re: subgraph/entailment
- Re: subgraph/entailment
- Re: subgraph/entailment
- Re: subgraph/entailment
- Re: subgraph/entailment
test?
Syntax tests checked into the test area
rq23 grammar now in yacker
some rq23 grammar comments
Minutes of 2005-08-30 telecon
Typo in example in 11.2.3.6
Review of http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/
agenda: RDF Data Access 30Aug
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 30Aug
- Item 8 issues#queryMimeType : Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 30Aug
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 30Aug
- Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 30Aug
regrets for dawg 30 aug telcon
rq23 grammar update
regrets
better names for r:IRI and r:Literal
SPARQL protocol spec checking: query syntax checking works
Passing test ExprBuiltins/result-str-2.ttl relies on an xsd:integer lexical form
"Discussion of Alternative Schema Languages and Type System Support in WSDL 2.0"
WSDL 2.0 issues
Review of http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/
Sorting
agenda: RDF Data Access 16 Aug in progress
- agenda: RDF Data Access 16 Aug
Possible grammar bug with PrimaryExpression and ArgList
Protocol tests take 2
Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2005-08-09 for review
- Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2005-08-09 for review
- Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2005-08-09 for review
Example protocol test
WSDL 2.0: speak now or forever hold your peace
protocol draft updated
construct test, re-revised
Roman numeral test
agenda: RDF Data Access 9 Aug
on "ORDER with IRIs" comment and user-selectable collation units
Andy's review of the the protocol doc (part II)
construct test case, revised
construct test
writing a triple filter?
Andy's review of the the protocol doc (part I)
- Re: Andy's review of the the protocol doc (part I)
- Re: Andy's review of the the protocol doc (part I)
clearing up CONSTRUCT's capabilities
- Re: clearing up CONSTRUCT's capabilities
- Re: clearing up CONSTRUCT's capabilities
- RE: clearing up CONSTRUCT's capabilities
[Fwd: SPARQL: Backslashes in string literals]
- Re: [Fwd: SPARQL: Backslashes in string literals]
[Fwd: SPARQL variable names syntax]
ACTION SteveH: update test matierials to show extendedType-eq-pass-result.n3
sop:str
Minutes of the DAWG telecon 2005-08-02
Call for Exclusions: SPARQL Variable Binding Results XML Format
regrets for 23 august
regrets for Aug 16
regrets for Aug 9, 16, 23
regrets for aug 9 telcon
new ValueTesting tests
modifications to ValueTesting/extendedType-ne-fail
last call status report
ACTION: EricP to finish ValueTesting/extendedType-eq-pass-result.n3
agenda: RDF Data Access 2 Aug (in progress)
minutes: RDF Data Access 26 July for review
[Fwd: Editorial comment on SPARQL Query Language Last Call]
[Fwd: SPARQL: QuotedIRIref too lax]
- Re: [Fwd: SPARQL: QuotedIRIref too lax] (badIRIRef)
- Re: [Fwd: SPARQL: QuotedIRIref too lax]
- Re: [Fwd: SPARQL: QuotedIRIref too lax]
[Fwd: SPARQL: Misspelled terms]
[Fwd: Sparql editorial comment: acknowledge prior art]
DAWG draft meeting record 26-July
Call for Exclusions: SPARQL Protocol for RDF
rq23 & protocol spec?
protocol editor's draft: 1.53
sparql test for order by and distinct
SPARQL Query Results XML Format - last call work
- Re: SPARQL Query Results XML Format - last call work
- Re: SPARQL Query Results XML Format - last call work
- Re: SPARQL Query Results XML Format - last call work (MIME stuff)
- Re: SPARQL Query Results XML Format - last call work (schema stuff)
agenda: RDF Data Access 26 Jul
Issue queryMimeType - a mime type for the SPARQL Query Language
explicit Unicode/charmod alphabet re "Charmod conformance"
local.css v1.7
ISSUE resultsMimeType - a mime type for the SPARQL Query Results format
move conventional prefixes closer to explanation of data, results notations?
Editorial comments :: 2005Jul/{0028,0029,0041}
- test cases for spec examples? [was: Editorial comments]
- Re: Editorial comments :: 2005Jul/{0028,0029,0041}
Review of http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/
tidying references, removing link to test-manifest.n3 link; editorial, right?
QuotedIRIref corner cases
valueTesting optional and error cases
more tidying references
ACTION: LeeF ... to review XML results set format. - Resend
ACTION: LeeF ... to review XML results set format.
editorial comments on SPARQL Query Results XML Format editors draft
BASE IRI resolution: syntax-based normalization and/or scheme-based normalization?
[Fwd: Re: SPARQL: sparqlResults namespace]
SPARQL QL Last Call WD published
SPARQL Query Results XML Format ready for review
- RE: SPARQL Query Results XML Format ready for review
- FW: SPARQL Query Results XML Format ready for review
Minutes of 2005-07-19 telecon
CFP Australasian Ontology Workshop
Experience with SPARQL/P/SOAP/Axis
agenda: RDF Data Access 19 Jul
Regrets
Regrets for July
Prevelance of bNode-as-URI queries
Introduction: Elias Torres and Lee Feigenbaum - IBM
Updated SPARQL Query Results XML Format draft
- Re: Updated SPARQL Query Results XML Format draft