twinql Retrospective motivates DESCRIBE refinement?

Did we consider this design already?


>    As I write, it occurs to me that some way to say which method is  
> being (server -> client), or should be (client -> server), used for  
> DESCRIBE would be desirable -- I'd like my clients to know that  
> they're getting CBDs, or the clients might wish to ask for a certain  
> kind of description.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Aug/0063


I'm considering re-opening issues#DESCRIBE. Advice is welcome.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Tuesday, 27 September 2005 13:33:36 UTC