- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 12:02:22 -0500
- To: andy.seaborne@hp.com
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 13:38 +0100, Seaborne, Andy wrote: > Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > > Dear RDF Data Access Working Group, > > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20050721/ section 10.1 > > notes "IRIs are ordered by comparing the character strings making up > > each IRI" it's however not clear how character strings are compared, > > I would have expected that a `string < string` operator is defined, but > > section 11.1 only defines such an operator for numeric and dateTime > > types. Please change the draft such that ordering of IRIs is clear. > > > > regards, > > > The current grammar does have a rather open production for QuotedIRIref > (anything except space and >). Note that I added this to the issues list. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#badIRIRef -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 1 August 2005 17:02:27 UTC