- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 19:47:22 -0500
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I wrote about this a while ago...
[[
We should probably be more clear about whether this
is a sparql query or not:
SELECT ?x WHERE { <foo###bar> dc:title ?x }.
REQUEST FOR TESTCASE.
I suggest that yes, it's a SPARQL query as defined by the
grammar, but it's erroneous; i.e. it's in the same category
as queries that don't obey the limitations on where variables
can go when using OPTIONAL.
So we probably need a new kinda of test case.
]]
-- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005AprJun/0156
Bjoern just commented on it in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Jul/0036.html
So I suppose I'll add it to the issues list.
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues
I plan to put it on Tuesday's agenda in any case.
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Sunday, 24 July 2005 00:47:25 UTC