- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:29:17 +0100
- To: Jeen Broekstra <jeen@aduna.biz>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 16:27 +0200, Jeen Broekstra wrote: > First a comment somewhat outside scope: the DAWG page > (http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/) still lists the link to the WD > draft and the editor's draft as "SPARQL Variable Binding Results XML > Format". This should probably change to "SPARQL Query Results XML Format". > > ---- > > Review http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/ > $Revision: 1.33 $ of $Date: 2005/07/21 13:51:05 $ > > > Table of Contents (http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/#contents) > ------------- > > The links for section 2.2 (Header) and 2.3 (Results) refer to the > wrong anchor. Both refer to "#docElement", this should be "#head" and > "#results", respectively. Fixed. > 2. Definition (http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/#definition) > ------------- > > "and this document defines an XML serialisation to encode variable > bindings Query Results from SELECT (SPARQL Query section 10.2). and > returning a boolean result from ASK (SPARQL Query section 10.5)" > > I suggest rewording and fixing of punctuation to: > > ". This document defines an XML serialisation to encode variable > binding query results from the SELECT result form (SPARQL Query > section 10.2) and boolean query results from the ASK result form > (SPARQL Query section 10.5)." Thanks for the words, changed to use them. > > 2.1 Document element > (http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/#docElement) > -------------------- > > "The XML format has document element sparql element ...." > > I suggest rewording to: > > "The XML format has as the document element the sparql element ..." > > or alternatively: > >"The XML format has as the document element sparql ..." Used the second suggestion. > > 2.3.1 Variable Binding Results > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/#vb-results) > ------------------------------ > > In the explanation of the ordered attribute, I suggest adding > explicitly that if set to true, the xml element order reflects the > query result order. OK, added a sentence. If the attribute value is <code>true</code> then the XML element order of <code>result</code> elements matches the query results order. > --- > > "The distinct attribute indicates that the results have are distinct > ..." > > I suggest removing the redundant 'have'. fixed > --- > "Note: The blank node label I is scoped to the result set XML > document and does not have any association to the the ..." > > I suggest removing the redundant 'the'. Fixed > --- > > "A query solution encoded in this format could look something like > the following:" > > I suggest rewording to something a bit stronger (it 'could' look > 'something like' leaves a lot of room for alternatives ;)), for example: > > "An example of a query solution encoded in this format is given > here:" OK, strengthened to An example of a query solution encoded in this format is as follows: > --- > > > Jeen All committed in CVS version 1.34 of http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/ Thanks Dave
Received on Monday, 25 July 2005 10:29:33 UTC