- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 14:53:34 +0100
- To: DAWG public list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 08:29:42 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: > > you might hope to get the highest v's back, but to my reading of the > > spec you will get back the one with the most 9s at the start, or something > > similar, as the ordering is lexical. > > Where do you see that? I see > > "If the ordering condition is a named variable, RDF Literals are > compared with the "<" operator (see below) where possible." > -- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#solutionsResults > v1.464 of 2005/08/10 15:51:50 > also in http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20050721/ > > and < is defined in the table below... > > A <B numeric numeric op:numeric-less-than(A, B) xs:boolean Yes, sorry. Ignore my message I was just confused about this again. - Steve
Received on Monday, 15 August 2005 13:56:14 UTC