- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 09:57:58 -0400
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 08:33:25AM -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: > > Did we consider this design already? > > > > As I write, it occurs to me that some way to say which method is > > being (server -> client), or should be (client -> server), used for > > DESCRIBE would be desirable -- I'd like my clients to know that > > they're getting CBDs, or the clients might wish to ask for a certain > > kind of description. > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Aug/0063 > > > I'm considering re-opening issues#DESCRIBE. Advice is welcome. Is this orthogonal or related to SADDLE? I would have thought such description (the server does *foo* when the client says DESCRIBE) would have been a SADDLE issue, though I guess the flip side is that the client says to the server "I want you to do *bar* when I say DESCRIBE". Cheers, Kendall -- Sad songs and waltzes aren't selling this year... --Cake
Received on Tuesday, 27 September 2005 13:59:30 UTC