- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 11:56:00 -0500
- To: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: DAWG public list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 17:40 +0100, Steve Harris wrote: > I just ran the SyntaxDev tests, and they all look fine to me, and my code. I'm not aware of any negative feedback on these tests, and the grammar that these tests are based on is responsive to all the comments I'm aware of. That looks like critical mass, to me. Anyone who has an issue with the grammar or any of these tests will please speak now (before or during tomorrow's teleconference) or forever hold their peace. Ah... I suppose, formally, we have re-opened the punctuationSyntax issue, and I think we're now prepared to close it. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#punctuationSyntax I'll be sure the records of the eventual decision are clear on that, though I haven't kept the issues list up-to-date from this respect recently. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 26 September 2005 16:57:21 UTC