- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 11:19:44 -0500
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hoehrmann writes, 'section 10.1 notes "IRIs are ordered by comparing the character strings making up each IRI" it's however not clear how character strings are compared' -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Jul/0038 I would have thought it's obvious that we mean lexical order by unicode code-point. I thought there must be some anchor in [CHARMOD] for that, but while I was looking, I found... C066 [S] [I] Software that allows users to sort or search text SHOULD allow the user to select alternative rules for collation units and ordering. -- http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-charmod-20050215/#sec-CollationUnits There was some discussion in IRC of whether the SPARQL QL spec has user-selectable collation units, but I didn't understand the conculsion, if there was one. So, firstly, question of fact: where's the relevant text in rq23? Does it specify user-selectable collation units? If so, let's have a test. Is there one? Has anybody passed it? If not, does it say why not? [CHARMOD] C066 says it should, so we owe and explanation as to why not. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 8 August 2005 16:19:50 UTC