Re: rq23 grammar update

On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 10:34 +0100, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> > 
> > Hmm... that seems to say that we're using a notation that's very similar
> > to the XML 1.1 grammar notation, but with a few tweaks. The sections
> > on comments, keywords, whitespace and escapes are grammar
> > notation tweaks.
> Yes - the XML 1.1 notation section is referenced.

But it's reference by saying "The EBNF format is the same as that used
in the XML 1.1 specification[XML11]" but as we're discussing, our
notation is not quite the same. I suggest

  The EBNF format here uses the following notational conventions
  in addition to the XML 1.1 specification notation.

Dan Connolly, W3C
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Tuesday, 30 August 2005 13:30:13 UTC