Re: rq23 grammar update

Kendall Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 04:23:28PM +0100, Seaborne, Andy muttered something about:
>>In response to comments on the grammar and escapes, I have updated the rq23 
>>v1.470 grammar section.
> Speaking very literally (perhaps unhelpfully so), I would think changing the
> language definition would necessitate another Last Call?

Personally, I would have thought it depended on the language change.

But, in this case, the language has not changed (except for characters in tokens 
and adding \u and \U escapes); the grammar has.  This grammar should accept or 
reject exactly the same strings as before.

The grammar passes all the WG syntax tests, additional tests, and various other 
negative tests both from the unapproved ones in the test area and a bunch more I 
have [negative tests rely on an extension to the manifest format as I described].

> Just wondering.
> Kendall Clark


Received on Wednesday, 24 August 2005 15:54:16 UTC