- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 10:25:39 -0400
- To: DAWG Mailing List <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Folks, A few issues to report: I had to soften the compliance language in the proto spec because we had unwittingly made it too strong. Instead of saying the only SOAP bindings that a compliant service could export were the ones we describe, we needed to have said the only SOAP bindings with HTTP as the underlying transport... I changed the spec, per DanC's advice as chair, to reflect this softening. And I'm sending this message to the WG to inform its members of that change (since we voted on the language or something...) The rest of the changes since 1.68 or thereabouts concern either document production issues that are not relevant here or are changes that were part of the decision to go to LC. The changelog is pretty good if yr interested. URIs if yr following along at home: $Revision: 1.71 $ of $Date: 2005/09/12 14:14:29 $ http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/ $Id: sparql-protocol-types.xsd,v 1.12 2005/09/12 14:15:31 kclark Exp $ http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/sparql-protocol-types.xsd (Hmm, this doc has an CVS $Id:$ as its <xs:schema version=""> attribute value -- that seems problematic suddenly... Is it?) $Id: sparql-protocol-query.wsdl,v 1.13 2005/09/12 14:16:43 kclark Exp $ http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/sparql-protocol-query.wsdl Cheers, Kendall Clark -- In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. --George Orwell
Received on Monday, 12 September 2005 14:26:46 UTC