- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:57:19 -0500
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <1126544239.4430.467.camel@dirk>
1. Convene, take roll, review records and agenda * RDF Data Access WG teleconference 2005-09-13T14:30Z (local times in major cities) * teleconference bridge: +1.617.761.6200 code:7333 * supplementary IRC chat: #dawg * log (to appear) * scribe: ?? * roll call: regrets JosD * PROPOSED: to accept minutes 6 Sep as a true record * next meeting: 20 Sep? * DanC has a conflict: TAG ftf meeting * scribe volunteer? * Let's continue these without discussion: * ACTION: EricP to extend < and relational ops to string, get review by Andy * ACTION: DanC to ask I18N WG for review of < on strings * ACTION: DaveB to find query with FILTER on URIs * ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on op:dateTime triple * ACTION: DaveB to to propose source test to approve * ACTION: SteveH to review the relevant test case re: IRI normalization (ref 28 Jun discussion) * ACTION: AndyS to add the above graph test cases (analagous to valueTesting test cases) ref ftf5 BOS discussion * comments on agenda? * I reached my tolerance for PoorMansHypertext, so I'm trying evolution's HTML editor 2. Toward Protocol Last Call * ACTION KC: make changes as agreed in 6 Sep discussion * 1.71 editor's draft ready for LC pub * ACTION EricP: publish proto-wd v 1.68 + changes from as LCWD 3. SPARQL Protocol and WSDL * ACTION: LeeF to draft WSDL 1.1 for SPARQL thingy with AndyS and Elias ETA 9 sep * ACTION: DanC to ask WSDL WG to review WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 2 SPARQL protocol stuff, once both are available * ACTION: KC to work with WSDL WG on describing POST binding with application/x-form-encoded in WSDL 2 * cf Data Access WG questions about WSDL of 15 Aug 2005 * ACTION: KC to work with WSDL WG on moving "style" from interface to binding * FYI: simple case of IRIs for Components in WSDL 2.0 Dan Connolly (Friday, 9 September) to public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org 4. comment: SPARQL Protocol: inconsistent parameter names * ACTION: KC to respond to inconsistent parameter names commentor * can't quite tell if this is done. 2005-09-06T15:35:18Z from kendall is progress, perhaps 5. issues#valueTesting : "language tag issues" * ACTION: ericp to draft lang-match design, summarizing and citing RFC3066 6. BASE IRI resolution comment 1. ACTION: ericP to send [OK?] message to Bjoern. re BASE IRI resolution comment 7. issues#valueTesting: handling type "error"s * ACTION: EricP to get SteveH's response to 0360 modifying truth table for OR 8. issues#rdfSemantics * note new issue; enumerate known options; initial straw poll 9. issues#owlDisjunction * note new issue; enumerate known options; initial straw poll 10. SPARQL QL grammar * rq23 grammar update Seaborne, Andy (Wednesday, 24 August) * test cases, e.g. SELECT ?x WHERE {.} * various comments on variable names, etc. 11. issues#badIRIRef * Let's look at the case of SELECT ?x WHERE { <foo###bar> dc:title ?x } and recent grammar work. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 12 September 2005 16:57:26 UTC