- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:57:19 -0500
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <1126544239.4430.467.camel@dirk>
1. Convene, take roll, review records and agenda
* RDF Data Access WG teleconference 2005-09-13T14:30Z
(local times in major cities)
* teleconference bridge: +1.617.761.6200 code:7333
* supplementary IRC chat: #dawg
* log (to appear)
* scribe: ??
* roll call: regrets JosD
* PROPOSED: to accept minutes 6 Sep as a true record
* next meeting: 20 Sep?
* DanC has a conflict: TAG ftf meeting
* scribe volunteer?
* Let's continue these without discussion:
* ACTION: EricP to extend < and relational ops to
string, get review by Andy
* ACTION: DanC to ask I18N WG for review of < on
strings
* ACTION: DaveB to find query with FILTER on URIs
* ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based
on op:dateTime triple
* ACTION: DaveB to to propose source test to
approve
* ACTION: SteveH to review the relevant test case
re: IRI normalization (ref 28 Jun discussion)
* ACTION: AndyS to add the above graph test cases
(analagous to valueTesting test cases) ref ftf5
BOS discussion
* comments on agenda?
* I reached my tolerance for PoorMansHypertext, so
I'm trying evolution's HTML editor
2. Toward Protocol Last Call
* ACTION KC: make changes as agreed in 6 Sep discussion
* 1.71 editor's draft ready for LC pub
* ACTION EricP: publish proto-wd v 1.68 + changes from as
LCWD
3. SPARQL Protocol and WSDL
* ACTION: LeeF to draft WSDL 1.1 for SPARQL thingy with
AndyS and Elias ETA 9 sep
* ACTION: DanC to ask WSDL WG to review WSDL 1.1 and WSDL
2 SPARQL protocol stuff, once both are available
* ACTION: KC to work with WSDL WG on describing POST
binding with application/x-form-encoded in WSDL 2
* cf Data Access WG questions about WSDL of 15 Aug
2005
* ACTION: KC to work with WSDL WG on moving "style" from
interface to binding
* FYI: simple case of IRIs for Components in WSDL 2.0 Dan
Connolly (Friday, 9 September) to
public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
4. comment: SPARQL Protocol: inconsistent parameter names
* ACTION: KC to respond to inconsistent parameter names
commentor
* can't quite tell if this is done.
2005-09-06T15:35:18Z from kendall is progress,
perhaps
5. issues#valueTesting : "language tag issues"
* ACTION: ericp to draft lang-match design, summarizing
and citing RFC3066
6. BASE IRI resolution comment
1. ACTION: ericP to send [OK?] message to Bjoern. re BASE
IRI resolution comment
7. issues#valueTesting: handling type "error"s
* ACTION: EricP to get SteveH's response to 0360 modifying
truth table for OR
8. issues#rdfSemantics
* note new issue; enumerate known options; initial straw
poll
9. issues#owlDisjunction
* note new issue; enumerate known options; initial straw
poll
10. SPARQL QL grammar
* rq23 grammar update Seaborne, Andy (Wednesday, 24
August)
* test cases, e.g. SELECT ?x WHERE {.}
* various comments on variable names, etc.
11. issues#badIRIRef
* Let's look at the case of SELECT ?x WHERE { <foo###bar>
dc:title ?x } and recent grammar work.
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 12 September 2005 16:57:26 UTC