- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 16:16:59 -0500
- To: kendall@monkeyfist.com
- Cc: DAWG Mailing List <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 15:02 -0400, Kendall Clark wrote: > Dogs, > > How do I say, in a CONSTRUCT query, that if there's a triple T in the > solution set, I can't parse that. Solution sets are made of bindings, not triples. > I don't want it in the output graph? I thought something like > FILTER fn:not(T), but that doesn't work in the WHERE clause. But that > doesn't seem to be legal. > > Do we have any functions that operate on triples? I suspect what you want can be done with !bound(?v) gymnastics. Can you give me a little more context? > Cheers, > Kendall -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 5 August 2005 21:17:05 UTC